- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 49,386
- Reaction score
- 7,271
- Points
- 2,244
- Location
- Greensboro, NC
- Military Branch
- Alma Mater
Any post with that many asterisks can't be right
I understand the concern - but saying this is the same old same old just doesn't wash. We didn't throw a king's ransom of picks at some aging former pro bowler, we did it to grab a once or twice in a decade franchise QB.
Now, it's perfectly legitimate to wonder, as Elephant has, whether RGIII is THAT GUY - but if Shanallen believes RGIII is that kind of QB, I don't think we'll spend much time mourning those #1 picks the next 2 years. And if our front office are the draft geniuses everyone previously believed, they'll find ways to make the next 3 drafts pay off, even if we don't have our #1's in 2013 and 2014.
We might have gotten better with those two #1's, but I don't think the 'better' would match what RGIII or Luck will bring this team.
An RGIII in hand is worth 3 in the bush. Or something like that.
I am ecstatic.
I understand the concern - but saying this is the same old same old just doesn't wash. We didn't throw a king's ransom of picks at some aging former pro bowler, we did it to grab a once or twice in a decade franchise QB.
Now, it's perfectly legitimate to wonder, as Elephant has, whether RGIII is THAT GUY - but if Shanallen believes RGIII is that kind of QB, I don't think we'll spend much time mourning those #1 picks the next 2 years. And if our front office are the draft geniuses everyone previously believed, they'll find ways to make the next 3 drafts pay off, even if we don't have our #1's in 2013 and 2014.
We might have gotten better with those two #1's, but I don't think the 'better' would match what RGIII or Luck will bring this team.
An RGIII in hand is worth 3 in the bush. Or something like that.
I am ecstatic.