So you don't believe in falsely accused, in fact his attorney stated he has proof he wasn't there. And again your going to conviction without discovery. Cute, wait until it happens to you. Remember mattress girl, false, again Duke lacrosse, false. You have as much facts as I do and you brought that to diminish a Buffalo team, you are as bright as your name sake who got busted for fraud. Keep your click bait bullshit away cuz you crave attention outta here.
I can tell you haven't taken philosophy nor law.
Someone needs to learn a little more before yapping. Araiza has an easy path to both a defamation and false light invasion of privacy tort victories if the girl is faking it. After all, being bloodied having worn jewelry inpiercing holes is not exactly something that can be faked.
Defamation constitutes the following.
1) a false statement purporting to be fact; 2) publication or communication of that statement to a third person; 3) fault amounting to at least
negligence; and 4)
damages, or some harm caused to the reputation of the person or entity who is the subject of the statement.
So, it could be that the rape is false
The rape has been published to a third person, numerous third persons.
Fault to at least negligence.
Damages - he lost his punting job at Buffalo.
Would be one of the easiest defamation cases to win if everything is indeed fake.
I get it, lay people thinking that innocence can be granted through authority and not through proving it. Not philosophically valid or logical.
I'm waiting for his counterclaim. That he hasn't filed a defamation suit...in indicative of unclean hands on an investigative level.
Even if the rape itself did not occur, there is the matter of civil assault as the damage from the jewelry is very much a simple matter of yes or no.
 }})
