Voice_of_Reason
The Franchise Player
Staff member
BGO Ownership Group
Joe Gibbs Club Member
Top Monthly Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2014
- Messages
- 4,558
- Reaction score
- 5,379
- Points
- 543
Yeah, but there are parts of the field and down and distances where you can't assume you go for it on 4th down.Traditionally you're correct, but exactly what you said... 3 downs.
They've changed the scope of thinking to 4 downs. 2 yards on first down essentially gives them a 1st and 8 with 3 cracks at it. It's a completely different ananlytical approach where 4th down is no longer a locked in punting situation.
On your side of the 50, unless game situation demands it, you're not going for a 4th down and 2. Even Quinn and Campbell don't do that. If you start going for 4th and 2 at your own 40, that's still outside the norm.
Once you cross the 50, and definitely between the opponents 45 and 25, the odds of going for it on 4th down are significantly increased, because you're in no man's land in terms of what to do. If you're at the 45 and punt, you probably pick up 30 yards of field position if you can get the ball downed at the 15. Better is great, but you can't assume that. But that's a 62 yard field goal, and there aren't many people who can pick that up. So, going for it makes a ton of sense.
At the 35, you can't punt. Now the question is do you attempt a 52 yard FG or go for it. The book would now say you go for it.
But if you're outside the opponents 45 or there abouts, most teams still almost always have 3 downs for 10 yards.


