Those stats are great. The issue at one layer is we are already paying Jonathan Allen and he is a pro bowler. So, how much money are you going to tie up in the DT position when Sweat and other younger players come to negotiate new deals next year and down the line?
Also, as indicated before Allen brings a consistency and vocal leadership to the team which Payne does not.
Allen missed some games earlier in his career and so his stats are skewing a bit low with 69 games played vs. 81.
My gut feeling again though on that score of productivity is that Payne benefits greatly from the attention paid to Allen.
I am not saying they are the same because I think Payne is a good guy overall, but the comparison to me I recall is that of Bryant Young and Dana Stubblefield in San Francisco.
Young was a consistent pro bowler and two-way player. Stubblefield put up great statistics next to Young and his final year before free agency posted an unheard of 15 sacks playing inside at DT.
What did San Francisco do? The 49ers recognized that Young was in fact the anchor of the defense and Dana benefited from playing with him. Moreover, those contract year stats that Stubblefield put up were not likely to be duplicated in the future and to pay him based on THOSE stats would be unwise.
And that's the way I fee here.
Of course Stubblefield turned out to be Haynesworth Jr. and a bad guy in the locker room and off the field with issues, so the comparison is not as a human being but strictly as a football player.
Bryant Young is a HOF quality player, Stubblefield is a guy that had some nice seasons with SF and helped win a Super Bowl.
But he never lived up to the contract he was given by Washington.
Clearly there was a difference in games played. That’s why I included per game stats.
Of course Payne benefits by playing next to Allen. Does Allen not benefit by playing next to Payne?
There is no question by me on the leadership difference. JA all day.