- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 55,812
- Reaction score
- 17,401
- Points
- 2,743
- Location
- Greensboro, NC
- Military Branch

- Alma Mater

So guys, a couple of comments (from a healthcare provider perspective)...
First of all, patient deaths are rarely the result of one thing. Short of a traumatic event, such as a motor vehicle accident, or fall with a brain bleed, rarely do folks die of 'one thing'. Even in those kinds of cases, comorbidities and chronic conditions already present may great impact if someone survives or not.
In the case of COVID-19, a patient who ultimately dies and had other major health issues - how can one not assume COVID-19 was a factor (if not the outright cause)? Are we suggesting it was just 'coincidental' that they happened to have a coronavirus infection but that it wasn't central to their demise? I am guessing (and yeah, it's just a guess) that some of the 'inflation' of death counts has less to do with some sneaky agenda and more to do with the reality that some patient start out with mild to no symptoms, but then quickly get into trouble and either die at home or shortly after hospitalization. In those cases, COVID-19 infection is a post-mortem finding. That's just one example where a patient death may initially be reported as cardiac arrest, or respiratory failure, only later to be more accurately changed to 'COVID-19' related.
I see nothing ominous about this. And I would be far more concerned with under-reporting of infection rates/deaths than the reverse.
First of all, patient deaths are rarely the result of one thing. Short of a traumatic event, such as a motor vehicle accident, or fall with a brain bleed, rarely do folks die of 'one thing'. Even in those kinds of cases, comorbidities and chronic conditions already present may great impact if someone survives or not.
In the case of COVID-19, a patient who ultimately dies and had other major health issues - how can one not assume COVID-19 was a factor (if not the outright cause)? Are we suggesting it was just 'coincidental' that they happened to have a coronavirus infection but that it wasn't central to their demise? I am guessing (and yeah, it's just a guess) that some of the 'inflation' of death counts has less to do with some sneaky agenda and more to do with the reality that some patient start out with mild to no symptoms, but then quickly get into trouble and either die at home or shortly after hospitalization. In those cases, COVID-19 infection is a post-mortem finding. That's just one example where a patient death may initially be reported as cardiac arrest, or respiratory failure, only later to be more accurately changed to 'COVID-19' related.
I see nothing ominous about this. And I would be far more concerned with under-reporting of infection rates/deaths than the reverse.

