We've had 25 years of hoping the next guy would do better. Norv was a bad HC, who was followed by 2 HOF coaches (1 who should not have gotten fired), and was succeeded by robiskie and Spurrier.
Last edited:
2 HOF coaches? Are you meaning Shottenheimer (he was after Norv, not before him)?
I'm not trying to elevate Norv Turner, I suffered through those years too. But my point is, he literally produced nearly the same results during his tenure as the coaches who succeeded him. I think that argues he might've been closer to 'average' than 'terrible' (especially since we're talking Gibbs for 4 of those years). Yeah, Gibbs got us to the playoffs one more time, but only with 9 wins. Turner got us to 9 wins in 1996 and were it not for a tie that went to OT against the Giants in '97, there was another potential Wildcard season. And he may well have gotten us 2 more wins in 2000 if he hadn't been fired.
Don't get me wrong - I was glad to see Norv gone. But he was a .500 coach, not a .300 one. He wasn't an incompetent coach as some here seem to want to label him.
You haven't joined any rooms.