Anyone can point to a blown pick by a previous regime as there is risk in the draft.
But I think one would agree that the more tape you have on a player in more varied situations on the field over time the better feel you probably will have in projecting him to the next level.
That said, the front office GM or Head Coach making the selection has to be able to look at the film and adequately evaluate the player
That didn't always happen here in the past.
At one point I think after Round 1 where we picked Allen and Payne, we fell into a continued pattern of staying on the Alabama 'bandwagon' in taking other guys solely because of that pedigree - that goes for Anderson, Shaun Dion Hamilton, etc. as well as the trade for Ha Ha Clinton Dix, another Alabama alum that did little here.
We are much more balanced now in our approach to the draft and free agency.
No hare-brained 'reaches for the sky' in free agency and mega-contracts as well as a sober consideration of the balance between athletic upside and need in the draft.
Remember 2008 when Vinny Cerrato decided to draft THREE pass catchers in Round 2, despite the fact the team had holes in a lot of places?
The fact all three receivers turned out to be busts of one shade or another only made it that much worse.