Does naming McKissic starter really amount to much?
There's already been many indications that Washington's offense will revolve much more around 2 RB 2 WR sets, so I'd assume we'll see McKissic and Gibson in the backfield more often than we see McKissic alone.
Who really knows, tbh. I am intrigued to see how the offense plays this year.
I'm REALLY trying to temper my expectations in order to take the positives from our performance. But without any pre-season etc, I am expecting a bit of a train-wreck early on before we start to settle in.
That said, I really liked Haskins progress toward the end of last season. He was starting to find a groove, especially with McLaurin and Sims, so I'm hoping to at least see growth.
I'm a little on the fence about the AP thing. On the one hand I liked his work ethic and professionalism around the youngsters... on the flip side, playing Haskins late last year proved that there's nothing like REAL game experience to teach a young player how to play. Thus I want all the reps running through the youngsters.
In that light, I'm good with letting AP go off to find somewhere he can be a more featured back and chase that record.