You mean Cousins who threw garbage stats so much that now even Vikings fans know it? Nice try.
Dunno what to tell you. 6 and on-the-way to 4 is not far better than 6-3-1.
You mean Cousins who threw garbage stats so much that now even Vikings fans know it? Nice try.
I think this offense could be significantly better than last year and still qualify. Our offense last year was that bad.
I think, with a decent free agent WR and solid rookie TE and a healthy, non-drop-off AP or a solid rookie RB, and an ok LT from somewhere ... perhaps our offense could rank on the low side of average? That would be a big jump for us. That's a big shopping list, though. And it's not one I'd think we could fill all in one season. And everything has to hit. Oh, and we could probably use a RT, and we haven't re-signed Scherff yet.
My point, before we got into a debate over semantics, was that given all of those holes/question marks, we may as well look to the future at QB rather than spin our wheels with a guy who isn't going to be on the team in two years. And/or I think it would be crazy to rob ourselves of a draft pick to add another position (QB) to that list.
Our defense is in much better shape. So there's that.
Anyway, that is all. Have good day everyone.![]()
I get it, I guess my sliding scale of 'suck' is different than yours, which is fine. I guess if we want to get literal, our offense likely will not be a strength, and the 'low side of average' is not sucking. Sucking is bottom 3rd to me. Sucking is not being able to score points, establish a game plan, or effectively execute a system. Alex Smith's offense sucked on paper but was 6 - 3 prior to the game he got hurt. It did what it was supposed to do. Jimmy G sucked vs the Vikings (11 / 19 - 131 - 1td - 1int). That 'sucks' but they won the game 27-10. The offense did what it was intended. This isn't a 'he just wins tho' argument either, because I get the bigger picture, but the ability to execute the intended offense, while maintaining a game plan isn't always the sexiest way to win football games. Haskins lost to the Giants pretty sexy last year in week 17.
Randall Cunningham: Qb of the futureNo you haven't...we are seeing a different type of QB. The NFL has never seen a QB like Patrick Mahomes...he's a completely different breed than just a running QB. And if you cannot see it's happening right in front of you, you're not watching the NFL.

I don't think you're far off with that assessment, I just think the same team from a year ago with more discipline wins at least 2 more games. Add some talent at areas of need, a scheme that is far less complicated than Gruden's and I could see winning 7, maybe 8 games next year.For the record, I'm pretty sure the Redskins won't fill all those holes this year. I think this team is looking at a three year plan. I'm hoping for 'low side of average' next year. This year I think the offense is going to suck (but I'll keep it lower case).
I don't think that's bad or means the Redskins are a terrible team or anything. Rebuilding takes time, especially on the side of the ball where the cupboard is particularly bare. My 'let's just say it' was just supposed to be a reminder of that. Of course lightning could strike. Something unexpected could happen. The planets could align.
We can all hope for that. But given the amount of holes we're dealing with ... I think it's highly unlikely.

Randall Cunningham: Qb of the future
Kordell Stewart: Qb of the future
Dante Culpepper
Mike Vick
Colin Kaepernick
RG3, etc
The list goes on and on how they were the new wave...evolution of the Qb. Have to find somebody like them because that's the trend the league's going in. Get a Qb like that or get left behind.
All of the stuff you're hearing about Mahomes,Jackson etc. was said about all the aforementioned.
And I do see it happening before me...the same old record, skipping.
Mahomes and Jackson are just the latest flavors to come along.

dunno what to tell you, either. Your recollection of Cousins' talent is shocking. considering we were still in the lead of the division and winning I can only chalk it up to the PTSD of being a fan. But, I am not that guy. I shake it off every year and move back to the top.Dunno what to tell you. 6 and on-the-way to 4 is not far better than 6-3-1.
dunno what to tell you, either. Your recollection of Cousins' talent is shocking. considering we were still in the lead of the division and winning I can only chalk it up to the PTSD of being a fan. But, I am not that guy. I shake it off every year and move back to the top.

Cousins may or may not be whatever it is you think he is, but 6-3-losing a game is not far better than 6-3-1.
may or may not be....sure. You go ahead and ride that boat as far as you can in this ocean of Skins fans. I'll be standing by with a buoy and a beer when you are finished.


Its sounds like youre trying to pick a fight about Cousins. Let me clear the air: I dont care about Cousins. I didn’t bring him up. He’s gone. Whatever he could or could not have accomplished here is now irrelevant.
But if you think he’s terrible and over-rated, you might want to consider that the incomparable Alex Smith’s magical 6-3 run was not ‘far better’ than anything that awful, rotten and foul-smelling Cousins did here. Their best seasons with the Redskins were actually quite similar ... well, until Smith’s leg snapped in two.
Just something to think about.

it sounds like you picked to defend Cousins when I said he was crap and a garbage stat player. You seem to care about him because you have continued to talk about him. If it was irrelevant, you wouldn't have made the comments you did. Plain and simple.Its sounds like youre trying to pick a fight about Cousins. Let me clear the air: I dont care about Cousins. I didn’t bring him up. He’s gone. Whatever he could or could not have accomplished here is now irrelevant.
But if you think he’s terrible and over-rated, you might want to consider that the incomparable Alex Smith’s magical 6-3 run was not ‘far better’ than anything that awful, rotten and foul-smelling Cousins did here. Their best seasons with the Redskins were actually quite similar ... well, until Smith’s leg snapped in two.
Just something to think about.
it sounds like you picked to defend Cousins when I said he was crap and a garbage stat player. You seem to care about him because you have continued to talk about him. If it was irrelevant, you wouldn't have made the comments you did. Plain and simple.
It was better. It was cheaper, and it was getting the job done. We actually won close games instead of throwing interceptions or getting mass stats once the game was already out of reach.

I talked about him in comparison to Smith, who’s record as a starter and who’s performance in the game against the Texans you incorrectly stated. Then you followed that up with an erroneous statement about Cousins (that Smith’s half season was ‘far better’ than anything Cousins has done.) If you had incorrectly compared Smith to Rex Grossman I would have pointed that out instead. But you picked Cousins.
I refused to defend Cousins like three times after that. You kept on it. I don't know why. I just posted some of his stats, without praise or criticism. If you thought Cousins was a crappy QB, Smith’s relative performance shouldn't be all that impressive. That was my point.
6-3 (technically 6-4) as a starter is not better. You talk about Smith’s Redskins leading the division. Cousins actually won the division once. Big deal. But you know what? It’s better than 6-4 and getting hurt. I’m not saying that to heap praise upon Cousins, but to put Smith’s ten games here into perspective.
Again, Smith is old and busted. He hasn't played in over a year, and even if he miraculously gets up to speed in time, he’s not a long term solution here. Why would a team working on a long term strategy, in desperate need of developing a young QB and the young talent around him, ever consider starting a guy like that? It would be a waste of valuable time we need to get the young guys experience while the coach is still on his honeymoon.
Smith is our Eli Manning, without the decades of goodwill. Its time to move on.
I looked at Alex's 2018 stats and you are right. His fauilt or not, he wasn't even middle of the pack stat-wise - except for ints/int % where he was near the top (as in among the lowest). The passing game was abysmal - I think many forget that. He was averaging around 218 yards a game; his completion rate was 62.5%, a horrific 10 TDs over 10 games...and so on. I recall thinking at the time that his strength was he played smart. As I recall, it was the defense that played well early on holding teams to an 11 point average in 8 of the first 10 games - while getting blown out in the NO and ATL games.
I don't think you're far off with that assessment, I just think the same team from a year ago with more discipline wins at least 2 more games. Add some talent at areas of need, a scheme that is far less complicated than Gruden's and I could see winning 7, maybe 8 games next year.
Before the off-season acquisition of new players, I am putting the over/under at 5.5. If Trent plays, add a vet WR, draft and sign a TE, tag Scherff, and add a RB who can compete with the oft injured Guice, we could win 8 games with our defense being the strong point.
Of course may be a tall order for player acquisition, but very possible. At the point we are able to fill some of those positions with serviceable players, Haskins needs to step up...but 8 wins is not out of reach. We were an 7-9 win team for 3 season prior to last year's collapse. A collapse I lay at the feet of one Jay Gruden.