WUSA: The Redskins Real Problem: Their Wide Receivcers

So you don't agree that we are fourth? What do you think, sixth? Eighth? We are definitely one of the better lines in the league.

A top pick or FA on that right side would make us elite.

Wow. I don't think I can even react to that without it getting ugly. Unbelievable.
 
Silent Threat, Manning, Brees and Rodgers always have at least two elite receiving threats. We have one. If you believe Santana is as good as Jimmy Graham, Gronk or Wes Welker, maybe 2.

So who is going to replace Moss as our second as he ages?

We need another threat badly.
 
Sproles and Colston have almost identical stats receiving and if you throw Thomas in there, they almost equal Graham. Graham is hands down the best TE in the game and they were under .500 last season.

Schemes and Coaches require certain players to be successful at certain positions. Some gameplans need an elite WR, others dont. Our gameplan does not REQUIRE "The Posse." We have the ability to go vertical, Hankerson is starting to play big, and Garcon is a playmaker. We utilize the TE position up the seam and with Griffin being comfortable and confident, he can spread it around. Pair that with a good play action game, and a strong running game, and we can.. oh i dont know, win a division?

If we want RG3 to pass more and run less, another receiving threat isn't optional. It's mandatory.

Right now it's way too easy to defend us.
 
Silent Threat, Manning, Brees and Rodgers always have at least two elite receiving threats. We have one. If you believe Santana is as good as Jimmy Graham, Gronk or Wes Welker, maybe 2.

So who is going to replace Moss as our second as he ages?

We need another threat badly.


no... Manning/Brady/Rodgers MAKE their WR Elite. Look at Greg Jennings... he's mediocre in Minnesota...

This team does not need to search for the "missing piece." They're building the correct way. We've got legit depth at TE, RB, QB. If Griff can either get time, or create time, you will see the WR continue to elevate their production.

We are 5 weeks into a bad beginning to a season... we finished the 1st quarter of the year and it's time to try to win the 2nd. To think the WRs are what's made this team 1 - 3 this year is comical, i'm just not going to agree with you.
 
No one said that we don't need WR's to win...we are saying you are delusional for placing the emphasis on WR you do in order for us to be great.

Green Bay threw the ball that year more than any team in history if memory serves. You are going to take more sacks and blanket stats are going to make it look worse than it is. They did not win the Super Bowl because they had "elite" WR"s! They won because Aaron Rodgers is great! And they're defense was unstoppable! Not because their WR's. You keep talking about how great certain WR"S are but fail to understand that those players are receiving passes from the best in the biz who are going to make them look better. Look at the WR's who played with Brees, Rodgers, Manning and Brady and then look at them once they went for the money...They almost always fall off in production!
 
So who is going catch those TD passes again?

We are too thin there.
 
So who is going catch those TD passes again?

We are too thin there.

Garcon and Hankerson on the outside, Moss in the clutch. We have more cap room next year and can pick up a successor to Moss, but i also feel Hank is going to come of age this year.
 
If you look back at our first four games, I'd say drops have led to our weak starts.

Equally responsible are missed tackles and blown assignments.. as well as a QB relearning his knee...
 
Garcon and Hankerson on the outside, Moss in the clutch. We have more cap room next year and can pick up a successor to Moss, but i also feel Hank is going to come of age this year.

Yes. We need a successor to Moss badly. FA or draft. Desperately.

And if Garcon goes down we are done.

We need two more. And not sixth rounders.

We have no Rueben Randle. No Nicks. No Alshon Jeffrey.
 
So, tell me this. How many years has it been, in your opinion, since we had a better receiving corps than we have now, as a whole ?

We've been behind the times for at least a decade at WR.

And we continue to be.

From the article:

The Cowboys are a prime example. Already loaded with Dez Bryant, Miles Austin, and the up and coming Dwayne Harris, Dallas still chose to select Baylor receiver Terrence Williams in the third round. The rookie receiver is already emerging as a much needed deep threat.

Look at what the Packers have built in Green Bay. They've made drafting weapons early on a necessity. Jordy Nelson and James Jones were second and third round picks respectively in back to back years. Randall Cobb was a third rounder in 2011, when Donald Driver and Greg Jennings were still valuable assets. The Packers now have a well oiled machine, capable of matchup problems across the board.

The list of teams with younger and better weapons in the passing game than the Redskins goes on and on. Denver, Philadelphia, Atlanta, New Orleans, Cincinnati -- even Buffalo has made it a drafting strategy to upgrade at wide receiver.


We aren't anywhere close to others at WR. Huge hole!
 
Yes. We need a successor to Moss badly. FA or draft. Desperately.

And if Garcon goes down we are done.

We need two more. And not sixth rounders.

We have no Rueben Randle. No Nicks. No Alshon Jeffrey.


I'm assuming you're pointing those guys out because the Giants are playing the Bears right now, but the Giants are 0 - 5, and the Bears are 3 - 2.
 
We've been behind the times for at least a decade at WR.

Well that wasn't what I was asking.
The question wasn't how we compare with the rest of the league, though we might be behind the curve, but the question was how we compare to what our own team used to be. And we've made huge strides at that position. And I don't see how fans can be so pessimistic about the position, when we've obviously made huge progress in that area, especially when we have much more glaring needs. What more can you ask for, other than progress ?
Back to my original question, it's may be somewhere between 1-2 decades since we had a receiving corps at the level we're at right now.
 
I'm assuming you're pointing those guys out because the Giants are playing the Bears right now, but the Giants are 0 - 5, and the Bears are 3 - 2.

I mention them because they are on tv right now, aren't even elite, but still come up huge. We don't spend high draft picks on WRs in a passing league. That's a huge problem.
 
I mention them because they are on tv right now, aren't even elite, but still come up huge. We don't spend high draft picks on WRs in a passing league. That's a huge problem.



We also have a cap penalty that forced a number of players to restructure just to be able to come in under the cap. We dont exactly have the money to start chasing big name FAs. We cant spend a no. 1 pick on a WR, because we cant exactly afford it right now. We have someone to get the ball to them, now we go after depth to keep him upright, as well as depth for him to throw to.
 
Fear, we can't be "behind the curve" in a passing league and think that's okay.

How can we compete year in and year out like that?
 
I'm not going to take sides here only due to the fact that we're all talking about the many ways we can improve the team.

Re: Josh Gordon.

The Browns want a second rounder for him and if you're the Redskins, the move must be made. He is a first round talent and no other receiver in the upcoming draft can match his skillsets. Gordon has a rookie contract that can be absorbed by the team - not a monster contract like we would see with a seasoned veteran. We won't find first round WRs like him in the upcoming draft and we don't have a first rounder anyway.

The team will be free of a cap penalty in March. You NEVER find an elite WR in free agency. It simply doesn't happen. Too, there will be no WRs in the upcoming draft that can match Gordon's skills - none. So, we spend that second rounder on Gordon now and have him on the roster for the next eight to ten years or more. Other needs can be filled in FA and the draft. Gordon, Garcon, Hankerson, Moss, Morgan, and Reed would be a scary corps for any team.

Having Gordon, Garcon, and Hankerson as your main three could do as well as Monk, Clark, and Sanders. Yes, I said it. You make this move now.
 
If you look back at our first four games, I'd say drops have led to our weak starts.

This season started with a drop on a pitch to our RB and an INT on the first throw that put us in a hole.
 
The Browns want a second rounder for him and if you're the Redskins, the move must be made. He is a first round talent and no other receiver in the upcoming draft can match his skillsets. Gordon has a rookie contract that can be absorbed by the team - not a monster contract like we would see with a seasoned veteran. We won't find first round WRs like him in the upcoming draft and we don't have a first rounder anyway.

The team will be free of a cap penalty in March. You NEVER find an elite WR in free agency. It simply doesn't happen. Too, there will be no WRs in the upcoming draft that can match Gordon's skills - none. So, we spend that second rounder on Gordon now and have him on the roster for the next eight to ten years or more. Other needs can be filled in FA and the draft. Gordon, Garcon, Hankerson, Moss, Morgan, and Reed would be a scary corps for any team.

Having Gordon, Garcon, and Hankerson as your main three could do as well as Monk, Clark, and Sanders. Yes, I said it. You make this move now.

Post of the year. You have a great forward vision.

If you want your Megatron, your Brandon Marshall....he's there. He's right there.

You go get him immediately.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top