Elephant
The Commissioner
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2009
- Messages
- 24,950
- Reaction score
- 528
- Points
- 1,143
- Alma Mater
Well ... the article DID start with:
True, Reid qualified/caveated the boldness of it out of existence with the rest of the piece, but it's still pretty hard to see this as a "fluff story about a kid being given an opportunity."
Oh I wasn't trying to say this was a fluff story. I was suggesting that fluff doesn't sell so they create the controversy through mere conjecture just to sell papers.
I should have stated, what could/should have been a fluff story about a kid being given an opportunity...
But we know that just doesn't sell. Controversy sells and Reid is stirring the pot, just like Jenkins and seemingly every other sports reporter everywhere!
Edit: I guess the next question is: What does that say about us, the general public?
Last edited: