- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 49,983
- Reaction score
- 7,720
- Points
- 2,544
- Location
- Greensboro, NC
- Military Branch
- Alma Mater
All signs in the Redskins first 2 outings of 2009 point to one inarguable fact - Jim Zorn doesn't trust Jason Campbell to get it done, at least not when it counts the most, on crucial downs or deep in enemy territory.
It's deja-vu all over again, reminding me of the feeling emanating from Joe Gibbs when he started with lukewarm enthusiasm a supposedly revitalized Patrick Ramsey in the 2005 opener, the year Ramsey was supposed to prove he 'was the guy' and take his game to 'the next level'. It wasn't to be. Gibbs didn't trust Ramsey anymore than Zorn is willing to give Campbell the keys to the car without a chaperone.
So I'm wondering - will Zorn pull the bait and switch as Gibbs did that year? If you recall, before the first half of game 1 against Chicago was even over, Ramsey got his bell rung good and BAM. The Brunell era began without so much as a 'thank you maam'. There was no real reason for it, no justification, and it didn't matter. Nothing even had to be said - everyone knew what they'd just seen, everyone except for Patrick Ramsey, who, head still spinning, actually believed Gibbs meant all the the right things he was saying prior to that.
So what are we to think now? The skins spent half the offseason trying to unload Campbell and upgrade at his position. Zorn may have played his defender and steadfast supporter through the turmoil of the Spring and Summer shenanigans- like Gibbs, he inherited the guy and has little choice not to 'support him'. But it's support as shaky and thin as a Redskin's sellout. Support that'll hold up at least until an opportune moment to shelve him presents itself.
I wonder if it's coming? And maybe quicker than we think?
Campbell's got a sprained ankle. We'll see if Zorn thinks he's fit enough to suit up against the Lions? If Zorn decides to hold him out, keep your eyes open, because you may be watching a 2005 switcheroo redux.
And I'll say it now - if Collins comes in, for any reason in 2009 - Campbell will have one hell of a time getting back on the field again.
It's deja-vu all over again, reminding me of the feeling emanating from Joe Gibbs when he started with lukewarm enthusiasm a supposedly revitalized Patrick Ramsey in the 2005 opener, the year Ramsey was supposed to prove he 'was the guy' and take his game to 'the next level'. It wasn't to be. Gibbs didn't trust Ramsey anymore than Zorn is willing to give Campbell the keys to the car without a chaperone.
So I'm wondering - will Zorn pull the bait and switch as Gibbs did that year? If you recall, before the first half of game 1 against Chicago was even over, Ramsey got his bell rung good and BAM. The Brunell era began without so much as a 'thank you maam'. There was no real reason for it, no justification, and it didn't matter. Nothing even had to be said - everyone knew what they'd just seen, everyone except for Patrick Ramsey, who, head still spinning, actually believed Gibbs meant all the the right things he was saying prior to that.
So what are we to think now? The skins spent half the offseason trying to unload Campbell and upgrade at his position. Zorn may have played his defender and steadfast supporter through the turmoil of the Spring and Summer shenanigans- like Gibbs, he inherited the guy and has little choice not to 'support him'. But it's support as shaky and thin as a Redskin's sellout. Support that'll hold up at least until an opportune moment to shelve him presents itself.
I wonder if it's coming? And maybe quicker than we think?
Campbell's got a sprained ankle. We'll see if Zorn thinks he's fit enough to suit up against the Lions? If Zorn decides to hold him out, keep your eyes open, because you may be watching a 2005 switcheroo redux.
And I'll say it now - if Collins comes in, for any reason in 2009 - Campbell will have one hell of a time getting back on the field again.
Last edited: