- Joined
- Jul 28, 2009
- Messages
- 281
- Reaction score
- 211
- Points
- 68
The tweet says "with upside can earn up to 96 million". Screams incentive laden which is logical. If he thinks he has no problem being productive in his 30s then he shouldnt be afraid of incentives.
It actually says with upside can earn OVER 96 million, not up to 96 million…makes it sound more like the “upside” would make him match or exceed Metcalf’s $33M/year but is rooted in $32M that doesn’t need upside to receive.
My guess would be as someone else mentioned, a heavily backloaded contract in year 3 with the ability to part ways with Terry after year 2 so it never becomes due…right in time to pay Daniels.
