- Joined
- Jan 20, 2011
- Messages
- 3,148
- Reaction score
- 2,182
- Points
- 303
- Location
- Harrison, Tennessee
- Military Branch

ESPN on Metcalf possibly to Washington
?
Washington Commanders
www.espn.com
Let's finish up with the Commanders, who might have loved to hear about this news a week ago. They traded a fifth-round pick to the 49ers for Deebo Samuel while taking on the veteran's full $17.5 million commitment for 2025. I don't mind the on-field fit, but it was a lot to pay for a player San Francisco was probably going to cut and one who has hit 900 receiving yards in a season once in six years as a pro.
Metcalf has been at or above 900 receiving yards in each of his six seasons, and he is a little under two years younger than Samuel. Of course, he's also going to be more expensive, in terms of trade compensation and his coming contract extension. But given that the Commanders had plenty of cap space and a clear need for another receiver alongside Terry McLaurin, I would have argued they would have been the best possible landing spot for Metcalf in a potential trade before the Samuel deal.
Could they still justify it? Maybe. Samuel is in the final year of his contract, and the Commanders could simply choose to let him play out that deal and move on after the season, but I don't think he would respond well to seeing them trade for Metcalf while giving the former Seahawks wideout a significant new pact in the process. It also seems as if Washington would be better off devoting most of its remaining resources to its defense, which was the weaker side of the ball a year ago.
?
Washington Commanders
DK Metcalf trade: Best team fits, offers for Seahawks
DK Metcalf, Seattle's top wide receiver, has requested a trade. These 10 teams have a need and the draft picks to get a deal done.
Let's finish up with the Commanders, who might have loved to hear about this news a week ago. They traded a fifth-round pick to the 49ers for Deebo Samuel while taking on the veteran's full $17.5 million commitment for 2025. I don't mind the on-field fit, but it was a lot to pay for a player San Francisco was probably going to cut and one who has hit 900 receiving yards in a season once in six years as a pro.
Metcalf has been at or above 900 receiving yards in each of his six seasons, and he is a little under two years younger than Samuel. Of course, he's also going to be more expensive, in terms of trade compensation and his coming contract extension. But given that the Commanders had plenty of cap space and a clear need for another receiver alongside Terry McLaurin, I would have argued they would have been the best possible landing spot for Metcalf in a potential trade before the Samuel deal.
Could they still justify it? Maybe. Samuel is in the final year of his contract, and the Commanders could simply choose to let him play out that deal and move on after the season, but I don't think he would respond well to seeing them trade for Metcalf while giving the former Seahawks wideout a significant new pact in the process. It also seems as if Washington would be better off devoting most of its remaining resources to its defense, which was the weaker side of the ball a year ago.