Tech/Computer advice from me

A little walk through how a security researcher created 14 million dollars out of thin air once he got into a bank's network

http://money.cnn.com/2013/05/15/technology/security/bank-heist/index.html

the worst part is, none of that is sophisticated. I know some here have no idea what they're talking about, but trust me flooding a switch with data and just sniffing the crap it spits out looking for a username/password is not hard. as the article says, those tools are available online for free.

the worst part would have been getting into the network. I doubt that would have been too much of a challenge given how easy the rest of the heist was.

and people want our hospitals transmitting healthcare records back and forth. lol.

edit:
to break it down for those interested, there are two types of devices for routing traffic on a network. a hub and a switch.

a hub is a dumb device. it takes data in one port and just spits it out all the other ports. it has nothing in it to make it smart, to route traffic from 1 device to another. it just broadcasts data indiscriminately, that's why they're called 'dumb' devices. to give you an example, BGO isn't encrypted (its not https, nor should it be, its not worth the cost). if you hooked up your computer to a hub and my computer was on the hub and you logged into bgo, your computer would send my computer your username and password. my computer would 'ignore' it because that's the way computers are designed - but that can easy be turned off.

a switch is a more sophisticated device - at least it's supposed to be. it takes traffic from device a, analyses it to figure out where it's going, finds the destination, then only sends that information to that destination. so if you were on a switch, I was on a switch, and you logged into BGO not only would I not get your username and password but I wouldn't even know you were logging into a website...

this guy did what is called 'packet flooding'. it used to be a naturally occurring (by that I mean not for a malicious reason, purely accident or defect) issue with networks - it would bring entire networks down until the device that was causing it was fixed. you basically overload the switch with information, it freaks out, and just starts spitting nonsense all over the play - like a hub. well that nonsense is actually packets with useful information in them if your device is lucky enough to get one of the packets and you're actually paying attention.

there's an overly long explanation for those interested.

by the way - open wifi networks behave the same as hubs. so when you're walking around with your phone connecting to random wireless networks and your facebook is logging in over http instead https (they may have fixed this...), your phone is sending your facebook login username and password to every device on the network. whether someone is listening or not... well, that's up to chance I suppose.

edit2: word is facebook now uses https which fixes that. but anything you use unencrypted over an open wifi network behaves that way.
edit3: lol spoke too soon. facebook allows you to turn off 'secure browsing', so its still a problem when you consider majority of users don't know what 'secure browsing' means.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If you are trying to install the latest Firefox (v20 or 21) on an XP machine, that could be where your problem lies.

I just allowed v21 to download and install automatically, so I have never had any problems.

I'm just trying to remove Firefox, not install anything, and it won't even attempt to un-install. I guess I could google for an un-install file. I've had similar problems with other programs that wouldn't remove, and I simply had to download and execute a special, separate un-install file.
 
I know there's a couple people here that work in fields related to mine. I have a question for you - what brand routers/switches are you going with?

We're trying to transition out of Cisco devices and into something else. Cisco has gotten nothing but worse. Their new hardware is flaky, slow, and buggy.

So if anyone can offer advice/information on new devices we'd love to hear it.
 
Ugh my phone just prompted an install for google hangout, in parentheses it says replaces google talk.

Google is going down their awful path at a much faster speed than I anticipated. Time to reconsider my 401k investments...
 
Abstract:
The U.S. government is proposing to expand wiretap design laws broadly to Internet services, including voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) services and other peer-to-peer tools that allow communications in real-time directly between individuals. This report explains how mandating wiretap capabilities in
endpoints poses serious security risks. Requiring software vendors to build intercept functionality into their products is unwise and will be ineffective, with the result being serious consequences for the economic well-being and national security of the United States.

Opinions on this?
 
I've been using Avast for many years, and recently began getting a new response to my scans, that I don't understand the cause. I never received this response until now, and it now happens on each and every scan.

It says "Some files could not be scanned". And when I click to view details, there's a list of about 200 files, and many of them from different folders (so too many to name), and it says they could not be scanned because they are password protected.

I have not been doing anything differently that I'm aware of, to cause this. So, I'm wondering if it's the result of an update to the Avast program, which targets files that it did not target before, or if a malicious infection is keeping these files from being scanned ? Or something else ?
 
Opinions on this?

Sounds like the government is not happy they don't have back doors into VoIP systems.

In terms of wiretap laws, my understanding is that they already have legal authority, so to me it seems they now want to require providers of the service to provide access?

Off the top, without any real research/knowledge, I would imagine that it does indeed pose a security risk to the software; you're building in a back door to the system for the sole purpose of monitoring activity without being detected.

Privacy and abuse concerns aside, I'll save you from that, my next concern would be that it would stifle innovation. I think it would in the VoIP field; large companies will have no problem meeting the regulations, but joe shmo playing in his free time will have much more of a problem and like it or not those types of people contribute a lot to technology.

In the end it sounds like an effort to go after terrorists that are increasingly using more high tech software/equipment to communicate around the world (according to our government.) The local drug dealers aren't using this - well, most of them aren't, I'm sure there are exceptions.

If, as a society, we've decided the government should have the ability to access communication this way then I don't have a problem with them adjusting the legislation to account for changes in technology. It's actually refreshing to see them trying to keep up, they so often fall ridiculously behind.
 
Reason: The Top 3 Things I Learned at the Bitcoin Conference

Thought of this way, the Bitcoin network is a platform on top of which other layers of functionality can run, much like the Web or e-mail are protocols that run on top of the Internet’s foundational TCP/IP protocol. Bitcoin therefore has the potential to spawn any number of other services that are decentralized, and thus difficult to regulate or control.

One application for such an extension to Bitcoin would be decentralized electronic markets—whether for futures contracts, sports betting, or anything else.

J.R. Willett, author of a white paper proposing such a system, explains with a thought experiment: Suppose two parties, A and B, want to bet on the future price of Google stock, and there is a third party, C, that publishes the price on the network every few minutes. A thinks the price of Google will go up and publishes a message to that effect, while B thinks it will go down and publishes a message accepting the bet.

“Now, they’re interacting on a protocol layer above bitcoin; they’re using a currency that’s on top of bitcoin that recognizes these kinds of messages,” says Willett. “So they’ve actually both committed and there’s an agreement that everybody in the world can see.”

Others on the distributed network don’t know the identities of who placed the bet, but they can see that A said it would go up, and that B said it would go down, and they can see C publish the price of Google in the future.

“If the price goes up, then the whole protocol recognizes that A won that bet; the whole protocol recognizes that A now owns B’s coins,” says Willett.
 
Schneier is, of course, a luminary in the IT field...crypto & security specifically. and while he is right on the direction things are moving..let's keep something in mind: it is still the case that there are massive numbers of hacks going on for which perpetrators are never discovered, detected, located and/or arrested. identity and authentication on the Internet remain huge problems. another way of putting it: if you don't want to be tracked...there are ways of making that happen.

it's not just the money. it is the technology itself. it is also politics - HIPPA anyone?
 
yes, but those ways are not available to common people - either through lack of knowledge , difficulty of use, or expense. that's kind of like saying you can travel via air without dealing with the TSA if you buy your own plane; it's just not available to everyone.

identity and authentication are severely broken, that is for sure. what's also broken is rights as they pertain to one's data. we've yet to address/define that in this country, others have. the sooner we have that conversation and come to an agreement on what is/isn't ok, the better. it's a free for all right now.
 
yes, but those ways are not available to common people - either through lack of knowledge , difficulty of use, or expense. that's kind of like saying you can travel via air without dealing with the TSA if you buy your own plane; it's just not available to everyone.

identity and authentication are severely broken, that is for sure. what's also broken is rights as they pertain to one's data. we've yet to address/define that in this country, others have. the sooner we have that conversation and come to an agreement on what is/isn't ok, the better. it's a free for all right now.

as I said...not arguing the trend line on privacy and a whole lotta other stuff. afterall, what in the world do folks think is the value proposition for Google?!

just saying the volume f successful hacks, crime, etc., that aren't traced to perpetrator suggests it's not that hard to evade. sure, joe/mary doaks just trying to get his/her pound of social media in fort he day likely does;t know the tricks. but the tricks aren't that hard to find.
 
photoshop cs6
1.6 gig download file - time to download, 12 minutes
running on a machine with an i5, 8 gigs of ram, and sata hard drive - time to install, 25 minutes

Only adobe could make a software package that size that takes longer to install than to download. Awful company.
 
My my my, what do we have here?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...dd4a00-cd5e-11e2-9f1a-1a7cdee20287_story.html

So Mr innovative and we're going after you for stealing our ideas has been found of patient infringement and had an order to block the sale of their first few generations of their flagship devices blocked?

They started this war and that's the biggest loss to date on either side. It's kind of moot because those are older devices but that is a massive blow to the apple fanboi ego.

edit: after reading some more it appears the infringement is not really on a design aspect, so what i said doesn't make a whole lot of sense (the making fun of apple.) still think it'll hurt their rep. wonder if samsung will make an ad about it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have a paid email account that I want to close, but it has a couple thousand emails in it, that I don't want to lose. If I try to forward them to my new email address, my current email service suspects I'm spamming after just a few forwarded emails, and they then suspend my ability to send emails.
Do you guys have any suggestions on how I could save these emails somewhere, so I can close the account ? They are important because many of them are actually emails that I send to myself, as a way of saving documents in a safe place.
 
Two options. Download Thunderbird here

Or, you can go to http://ninite.com/ and download any FREE applications you want. They will be installed without you having to click 'NO' when asked if you want to install any of the other associated crapware. You get the latest release software, but it's up to you to keep them up-to-date. I check mine at least once a month.

My preference would be to install via option 2.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 2, Members: 0, Guests: 2)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top