I'm as puzzled by the move and timing of it as you guys are...and I'm not so much 'defending' it as trying to give it some context. Couple of things - I have read a lot of commentary about the 'same old same old' related to this year's decisions. That's a fair comment to make in criticizing Snyder, but Shanahan and Allen have had only a year here and can only reasonably be held accountable for the decisions since they got here.
But you understand why we're worried right? I mean, you are trying to change the culture, trying to make better decisions, project a new image of competence, and... same old, same old is the result? Yeah, that worries me. I was really hoping Shanahan's professionalism and acumen would save us from the mismanagement we had under Vinny.
But we're seeing the same mistakes. Not a good sign.
When it comes to the Mcnabb decision, firstly we don't know what's going on with him and the coaching staff. They may have given him very specific guidance on what they want to see from him, and repeatedly had him not follow that guidance. I give Mcnabb credit for being a classy guy and saying the right things in public, but that doesn't mean he's doing what he's supposed to be doing or listening to the coaching staff. Somethings not right there, and hasn't been for awhile, and this may have as much to do with those dynamics as wanting to look at Grossman.
I can agree with this. Which is why a little communication would be nice. Again, just couch it as being a bad fit for Kyle's offense, salvage a little of McNabb's trade value, and move on.
As for Grossman - right now, he's a failed starter. That's who he is. But K. Shanahan apparently thinks he has rehabilitated many of Grossman's previous issues. I am skeptical, but Grossman has enough natural talent to be worth taking a look. I am surprised by the benching of Mcnabb, but I would disagree that the decision to sit him is 'crazy' or proof of coaching 'incompetence'. I think the decision that Mcnabb would not be here after this year was made weeks ago (and I agree with it), and in light of that, we don't have much to gain by continuing to play him (unless you feel a pyrrhic victory against Dallas should be our top priority). If we are going to blow up the QB position after this year, wouldn't it be helpful to know if Grossman CAN serve as a competent back-up, or even temporary placeholder at starte if we somehow do manage to get a young QB stud in the draft?
Ummm, have you seen the "How Much Do you Hate Dallas?" thread? A lot, is the answer. I don't think there is such a thing as a pyrrhic victory against them. Having said that, it would be helpful to know if Grossman can serve as a back up. But Rex as a mentor? That doesn't scare you at all? Really? I think some of the other QB options in free agency may be better than Rex. But it is possible I'm wrong (my wife confirms this happens from time to time), I suppose we will see.
I also disagree this season has been a total disaster. We've seen the team able to mount an effective running game, and we've seen them do it with a mostly crap offensive line. That gives me some hope for the future. We've seen some young talent emerge and play well - not as much as I'd have liked to have seen, but we've seen some of it. And despite all the hand-wringing over the lack of progress overall, we have won more games than last year and with a reduction in some of the ridiculous mistakes at crucial game moments, could potentially have gotten to a .500 record this year. Have I liked what I've seen? Nope. But Shanahan was out of coaching for a bit, and I expect things to improve. The other thing I've noted, and which most totally ignore, is that the players appear to mostly still be on board with coaches. I think that's also a positive sign.
Your last sentence is what worries me. Apparently, from some reports I thought I saw yesterday, the players were not thrilled with the benching of McNabb. Shanahan does get marks in my book for holding the team together through this year, but if he loses them at the end, not sure that's a victory.
As for the reduction of mistakes, I can agree with that as well, our record could, or even should, be better than it is. But how much of that should be attributed to coaching?
I think the idea that Shanahan gets one year to make the fans feel good, and that Snyder moves on after just a single season, is just PFT fantasy talk. It's not going to happen, and more importantly, it shouldn't happen. Shanahan has built very successful teams in the past, and he might do it here if we can be patient. I think Snyder has hitched his horse to Shanahan and Allen and we're in this thing for the next 4-5 years.
I don't think it should happen either. I also don't think 4-5 years is accurate. If we go get smacked down by Dallas, and then again by Jax and NYG, I think the pressure is on Shanny to win next year. Not 12 games or anything stupid, but at least 7-9. We need to see improvement. And frankly, we didn't see it this year.
You still haven't answered my question that was buried in the dissertation:
Would you be absolutely shocked if you woke up in early January and Shanahan was no longer the coach of the Redskins, either through his choosing or Snyder's?