redskins26
The Team Captain
- Joined
- May 17, 2010
- Messages
- 2,607
- Reaction score
- 19
- Points
- 68
- Military Branch

Overthecap.com breaks down a few different ways



In my mind we keep and pay Reed and Cousins and let the others go.
We could be preparing to make a move a WR.
If we draft a WR with one of our first two picks, it is conceivable that one of the veterans gets released.
Recall the Redskins brought Anquan Boldin in for a visit and as a physical possession receiver he does a lot of what Garcon does.
At 35 Boldin was productive last season despite not having a stable qb situation in SF.
I could see a situation where we sub Chancellor's salary for Garcon's, draft a WR to be the long-term answer, and sign Boldin to get us through 2016.
Where do you guys find the stats like 'so and so is the 31st paid person at this position'?



Overstated for emphasis. Which you clearly understand. We definitely need to find the receivers of tomorrow. I don't think we need to jettison Garcon, or Jackson, this year to do it. Kirk is familiar with them, and they know the offense. Grant may prove more valuable this year. But I be damned if I want to find out he ain't AFTER moving on from Garcon. Not to mention Garcon is our best blocking WR. Which we'll need if we're going to improve our putrid running attack. Jackson is still a game changer. I'd love to get both guys to restructure to a more cap friendly number. But, even if they don't, I believe they are essential for Kirk's success, this year.I think that's overstating it Ax but I get your point. I expect Crowder to take off this year. Jackson will be more expendable when he does. I agree with 'if it ain't broke...' At least for this year. But we will have to find long-term answers at WR eventually. If a top talent drops to us it wouldn't shock me if that starts sooner rather than later.
This past weekend, I had the pleasure of bumping into a guy you'd think had no business being an NFL wide receiver. Toughest little sonofabitch what ever wore the Burgundy and Gold. Not saying Crowder will become the next Gary Clark. But try telling me with a straight face that little guys have to be speed demons to succeed in the NFL.Just an opinion, but I think there's a cap on how successful that Crowder can be in this league, due to his physical limitations.
He's 2 inches shorter than both Santana and DeSean. And he's not fast enough to make up for the height difference.
It's hard to imagine a guy that small, going higher than a slot, or #3 on the chart.
Although, of course, he will no doubt, end up becoming very good at that position.
Just an opinion, but I think there's a cap on how successful that Crowder can be in this league, due to his physical limitations.
He's 2 inches shorter than both Santana and DeSean. And he's not fast enough to make up for the height difference.
It's hard to imagine a guy that small, going higher than a slot, or #3 on the chart.
Although, of course, he will no doubt, end up becoming very good at that position.
This past weekend, I had the pleasure of bumping into a guy you'd think had no business being an NFL wide receiver. Toughest little sonofabitch what ever wore the Burgundy and Gold. Not saying Crowder will become the next Gary Clark. But try telling me with a straight face that little guys have to be speed demons to succeed in the NFL.
Try.
You clearly tried to say little guys have a cap. I simply proved, as did others, that there are always exceptions.There's just not enough examples to support it.
Successful dwarf receivers are very much the exception to the rule, and an extreme rarity.
You actually had to go back a few decades to come up with the Gary Clark example. And that should say something.
You clearly tried to say little guys have a cap. I simply proved, as did others, that there are always exceptions.
Now you're getting desperate.And every single one of those guys was taller than Crowder