Howling for Howell

When he came back from his injury in 2013 Griffin was a different player. The scheme that Kyle Shanahan came up with to hide Griffin's inability to read coverages and look for second and third targets in progressions was exposed when Griffin could no longer use 4.4 speed to get outside with his feet.

Based on what he did with a Cleveland team that failed to win a game for almost 2 years, I laugh when he talks about his 'NFL experience'.

I suppose he is banking on his 3 years of sitting on the bench in Baltimore and holding for extra points behind Lamar Jackson gave him some rare insights that others don't have about being successful in the NFL.

Griffin was another flawed player that like Dwayne Haskins was immature and selfish and came to the NFL thinking he had it made.

In reality neither one had the 'right stuff' in terms of game preparation, toughness or football IQ to be successful in the league.

Leave it to Danny Boy the GM to have made the decision in both situations to draft these players when better ones were available.

Not ONLY draft them, but IMPOSE them on his most trusted hires. Effing Dan Snyder, the greatest football mental midget of all time.
 
I expect to hear today or tomorrow that Brissett will be the starter going forward. Though Howell won’t like it, the team will be doing him a favor.
 
Yes on the first part. I'm not sure on the 2nd. This season was all about 'growing and developing' Sam Howell until he actually needed growth and development - but apparently this coaching staff neither has the stomach to let it happen, nor any clue how to help him. Pathetic.
 
Yes on the first part. I'm not sure on the 2nd. This season was all about 'growing and developing' Sam Howell until he actually needed growth and development - but apparently this coaching staff neither has the stomach to let it happen, nor any clue how to help him. Pathetic.
My second part is based solely on the opponents.
 
I'm going to go on record as saying if we draft and revamp our OL that Howell will return to his great form he had at a point this season.

If we don't and expect the same...he's going to end up like Carr from Houston and out of the league.

I'm pulling for the kid though. He just needs a butt load of help from coaches and line.
 
I'm going to go on record as saying if we draft and revamp our OL that Howell will return to his great form he had at a point this season.

If we don't and expect the same...he's going to end up like Carr from Houston and out of the league.

I'm pulling for the kid though. He just needs a butt load of help from coaches and line.
I've moved into the QB camp, but only if we stick at 2. If we have any other draft pick, I'd love to stick with Howell and build the lines. It's funny. The only player I really don't want is Marvin Harrison Jr. I'm sure he is a great wide receiver, but that feels like ordering desert before you take your first bite of veggies. Give me protein or give me veggies with our number one.
 
Caleb Williams scares the hell out of me. Looks as if Chicago is going to trade the #1 pick so we probably won't know who is going to be selected until near the draft.

But if we are sitting there at #2 and Maye goes #1, I would be in favor of a trade down to take Penix and let someone else take Williams.

To me he has the highest pure bust potential of the anticipated first round quarterbacks.
 
There isn't a QB in the draft that makes me want to pick them up over giving Howell another chance with a decent line and good play calling
 
Howell to me is most likely to be the victim of circumstances.

If the coach that drafted him was not a lame duck but in his first year as HC, Sam would probably get that extra time to prove himself with a better supporting cast.

As it is, it seems difficult to believe a new GM and head coach are going to go with someone else's former #5 pick and perhaps trade down and take Alt or another OL, DL or CB, etc.

It would be that rare GM and coach that would buck the expectations and bring things back for a reset next summer.

If we hire the 71 year old Belichick heaven knows what he would do :biggrin-new:

Given that he seems lost in the same quarterback forest as Ron Rivera (Cam Newton, Mac Jones, Bradley Zappe), perhaps Bill would trade down or stay at #2 and take the best overall athlete available.

Tough to see anyone else doing it though.
 
More than a few times this season, I've seen Howell compared to Baker Mayfield by both pro pundits and fans.

Yesterday, Baker went 22/36 for 337 w/ 3 TDs and 0 INTs. He took 4 sacks.

He also won a playoff game.
 
My kid was asking me about this very thing. He thinks Howell is as good and is curious why teams like buffalo and Tampa are better.

I said it starts with the coaches. They need to get the most out of everyone and work to their strengths. Then I said you can't just have one star on a side, you need an entire squad of players who play their hardest together as a team before you will win anything.

I didn't see Howell as the issue until later in the season when he started getting pummelled. I blame the coaches for bad play calling and not getting the best out of their players.
 
I shake my head at those who make their living (along with their editors) using the written word making elementary-level mistakes.

“While we know Howell through the ball at a rate most consider to be alarming, was it a historic pace?”
 
Yeah...I'm married to a middle school English teacher.

The reliance on spell-checking software that has no awareness of context is just crazy. And don't get me started on how this gets missed when read by more than one person.
 
I shake my head at those who make their living (along with their editors) using the written word making elementary-level mistakes.

“While we know Howell through the ball at a rate most consider to be alarming, was it a historic pace?”
Your not cereal about dis, is you?

All writers rely on editors pretty heavily. One reason is that it's actually hard to read your own writing. Most of us read our intentions instead of what's on the page. This is why so many homonyms and embarrassing typos slip through. I know I have been guilty of this any number of times. I do try to catch them and hope my editors find the ones I miss, but every so often they slip through. The one that really sticks to mind was associated with me, but not mine.

In a lot of cases, the reporter does not title their own articles or work. In this case, I had scored an interview with Mark Hamill. It was on the occassion of Bob Anderson's death. Anderson was the fight choreographer for the original Star Wars trilogy, Princess Bride, and many other movies. He also dueled Erol Flynn back in the day, was a gold medal fencer, and a Royal Marine during WWII. So, he was a pretty big deal. Besides, as a Star Wars nerd, scoring an interview with Mark to do an homage to Bob was a major highlight. So, I kept checking the website often to see when my interview was posted.

I never called the office faster than when I saw the title "Darth Wader's Swords Master"
 
Last edited:
And just in case some of you may like Star Wars here is the interview
 
Your not cereal about dis, is you?

All writers rely on editors pretty heavily. One reason is that it's actually hard to read your own writing. Most of us read our intentions instead of what's on the page. This is why so many homonyms and embarrassing typos slip through. I know I have been guilty of this any number of times. I do try to catch them and hope my editors find the ones I miss, but every so often they slip through. The one that really sticks to mind was associated with me, but not mine.

In a lot of cases, the reporter does not title their own articles or work. In this case, I had scored an interview with Mark Hamill. It was on the occassion of Bob Anderson's death. Anderson was the fight choreographer for the original Star Wars trilogy, Princess Bride, and many other movies. He also dueled Erol Flynn back in the day, was a gold medal fencer, and a Royal Marine during WWII. So, he was a pretty big deal. Besides, as a Star Wars nerd, scoring an interview with Mark to do an homage to Bob was a major highlight. So, I kept checking the website often to see when my interview was posted.

I never called the office faster than when I saw the title "Darth Wader's Swords Master"
Darth Wader is a tough one to through out there. 🤣
 
I was so embarrassed and mad especially since Mark told me he was giving me an exclusive because he did love Bob and hoped other outlets could quote our piece.

If you’ve ever thought me crazy that’s the kind of thing that drove me over the edge 🤪
 
Outstanding work, BG. Thanks for sharing. Making interview into conversation is an art.

Must note that Mark was a generous subject. No apparent ego, very personable, delightful.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 0, Members: 0, Guests: 0)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top