Desean Jackson in Burgundy and Gold?

Should the Redskins Sign WR Desean Jackson?

  • Yes - the Redskins badly need a starter opposite Garcon!

    Votes: 8 20.5%
  • Yes - but only if the contract strongly favors the Redskins.

    Votes: 15 38.5%
  • No - he's not the kind of player this team needs.

    Votes: 11 28.2%
  • I would prefer not, but will take a wait-and-see attitude and hope Gruden can 'coach him up'.

    Votes: 5 12.8%

  • Total voters
    39
  • Poll closed .
Given the only negative factors here are a lot of rumors and that we apparently had legitimate competition for his services, I don't think it would've been realistic to expect we could have paid less.

That's less than I thought we would end up paying - and I think,amazingly we paid what is probably fair market value for him.
 
Viewing this with equal parts excitement and dread. If Kouandjio makes it to the latter part of the first round as projected, we'd do well to trade up a few spots to make the investment in DJax pay off.
 
Given the only negative factors here are a lot of rumors and that we apparently had legitimate competition for his services, I don't think it would've been realistic to expect we could have paid less.

Be that as it may, that's a lot to pay for a #2 WR. I didn't think in my wildest imagination we'd have paid what he was making in Philly. That would have been insane.

I'm interested to see how the contract breaks down.
 
Last edited:
Keep in mind that the Cap will increase next year and the year following as per the new CBA.
 
Eagles pay DJax $10.5 a yr, Skins only on the line for $8M a year. Less money and we get a guy who has something to prove. Love it

--Nick Roby

That's a bargain, my friend. That's a big discount.

he forgot the part where eagles cut him because of his pay, among other things like his attitude/work ethic.
 
Keep in mind that the Cap will increase next year and the year following as per the new CBA.

It usually does. That won't change the fact that we will possibly have two of the fifteen highest paid WRs on our roster.
 
Spin...he was cut IMO because of pay and his inflexibility in taking a cut. Couple that with the Kelly offense not exactly putting a premium on stretching the field with a burner, the signing of Sproles for relatively cheap and it becomes a rather unsurprising move. None of this other stuff came up until it was time to pay him and take the cap hit. Whatever, if being cocky was a detriment in the NFL then I must have missed something with almost every skill player I've ever seen suit up.
 
It usually does. That won't change the fact that we will possibly have two of the fifteen highest paid WRs on our roster.

Wanna bet they aren't top 15 when those cap numbers go up? That was part of my point, their salaries are top 15 now but that will change when other WR's trump that in a future market that won't have such a deep and rare draft's shadow looming over it. This draft is by all accounts maybe a once in a life time draft in terms of depth and has a crazy WR crops if all the analysts are right.

But for me it's simlpe. Produce. Do that and the money is worth it.
 
You mean his 1,300 yards plus work ethic? Sign me up, please!

No, I meant his not showing up for meetings/practice work ethic.

I get that you're pro-all-things-Gruden right now, but come on. You're being ridiculous.
 
If the Patriots had made this move/deal, there would be songs sung in the hills, and solemn nodding around the NFL universe, over the continued wizardry/genius of that organization.

That the Redskins made it--understandably--colors it with a layer of doubt.

One thing we DO know for sure this morning? Opposing defensive and special teams coordinators are going to drink a lot more Monster the next ___ years during Redskins week.
 
Jackson deal not signed yet, full guarantee will be $16 million | ProFootballTalk




shit, that aint bad at all for someone of his talent. even if he gets his max deal its still only 8mil per year. Garcon's deal is five years for $42.5 million with $20.5 million guaranteed so there shouldn't be any infighting between them over money either. it works out to just about the same.

Agreed.

I have no idea if the baggage was worth the risk, but we didn't make a typical "Redskins Move." I've been catching flak from people for this all morning and I can confidently look them in the eye and say - If you think this is a typical Redskins move, then you aren't actually paying attention.

For me it also brings down, in serious manner, the level of criticism I would have had if this doesn't work out.

Not that Bruce Allen gives two you-know-whats about what tshile from BGO thinks :)
 
Great Job Washington Redskins! Now go get us a couple of good olineman and it's game on.
 
The reason he didn't show up for meeting and practices (which is pretty much inexcusable) was because the Eagles wanted him to continue to return punts. Is it reasonable for a pro-bowl caliber, starting receiver in his sixth year to not want to return punts? To risk injury when he's more valuable in his starting role? Even Gibbs would only ask Green to do it infrequently when it was a huge game.

It's reasonable to return punts for 10+ million a year. It's reasonable to understand that you signed a contract and your employer is asking you to do something that is in no way, shape, or form outside the bounds of a reasonable asignment from your employer. They weren't asking him to traffic drugs - they were asking him to return punts.

It's also reasonable for him to not like that, and to go about discussing the issue and trying to resolve it in a manner he sees fit like a responsible adult.

It is not reasonable for him to sign a 10+ million dollar/year contract to play a game, then refuse to show up to meetings because he doesn't like the position he was assigned. Especially when that assignment is literally a tiny fraction of his playing time.

As for the 'character' issue, everyone does realize that he doesn't beat his wife, hasn't been arrested - not for DUI, assault, dog-fights, etc. It doesn't look like he smokes weed...not having been suspended for any games. He also works with a community charity in Philly. This is pretty much a hit job by the Eagles and that tight-wad Laurie.

Kelly is going to realize that DeSean was a big part of that offense...an offense Kelly believes DeSeans' skill set didn't fit in. And their loss will be our gain.

DeSean will make us cringe at times with his celebrations, but he'll produce...and I can tolerate seeing his TD celebrations over and over and over again.

He has been arrested - unless the news reports have exaggerated the case and he wasn't arrested but instead cited (plausible, I haven't fact-checked it.) And it was for having weed, actually. But I honestly don't care about that - NFL players smoke weed and some make enough mistakes to get caught. I know that, and everyone else knows that. I bet a lot of our own guys do it, but are just smart enough to not get caught. I'm cool with it.

And the character issue concerns are clearly related to his attitude on the field, in the locker room, and the report about gang affiliations that (at this point) seems unsubstantiated and a weak, cowardly move by an eagles front office not known for doing that.

But yeah - he's a better person than Meriweather. And we're not putting together a choir. I just hope he's not a Hernandez in waiting. The more time that goes on the more the leaks from the eagles front office look cowardly and pathetic. We'll see.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I admit... I think Jackson is a dumbass of the first degree, but the funniest part in all this is hearing everyone on NFL Radio 24-48 hours ago defend the guy because the LAPD said he had no gang connections and today they clobber him as a locker room cancer and only take phone calls about how his production last year came at the expense of only NFCE teams.

Even if those are the same teams he'll be seeing six times this season (swapping us and Philthy).

Nick
 
I admit... I think Jackson is a dumbass of the first degree, but the funniest part in all this is hearing everyone on NFL Radio 24-48 hours ago defend the guy because the LAPD said he had no gang connections and today they clobber him as a locker room cancer and only take phone calls about how his production last year came at the expense of only NFCE teams.

Even if those are the same teams he'll be seeing six times this season (swapping us and Philthy).

Nick

The national media makes their living betting against the moves the redskins make.

Can you blame them? that's been the smart bet for 20 years.
 
I love the comments after that story as well. Sherman has an education and can speak intelligently, its a shame he doesn't do it more often instead of popping off at the mouth constantly and making himself look like a fool.

I'm not a fan of peter king, but I agree with the sentimate of that article as even more so with what you're saying.

It's a real shame a guy that graduated from Stanford with a respectable (very respectable) GPA acts the way Sherman has chosen to act.

Yes, he's making money off his caricature. I would like to think there's even more money, and more respect to be earned by being what he actually is. It's a shame he didn't realize that (or agree with it) and made the decisions he's made.
 
The national media makes their living betting against the moves the redskins make.

Can you blame them? that's been the smart bet for 20 years.

I agree, but am still finding humor in signing him being a move worth this possible risk in their own eyes just a calendar day or two ago. Now it's the Titanic again. If Oakland had signed him, this whole thing would have just gone night-night.

Nick
 
Garry Williams said on ESPN 980 yesterday:
"This is a big boy league. You get a chance to add a guy like that, you do it"

He's a college basketball coach (hall of fame one at that), for those that don't know. And he knows this move makes sense :)
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top