- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 15,892
- Reaction score
- 9,226
- Points
- 1,093
- Location
- W Palm Beach & Helsinki
and the members of his gang.


Having ties to Oakland doesn't necessarily mean he has interest in them does it? .



As long as the Washington Redskins are attempting to climb out of the NFC East basement, they will need a lot of luck. With wide receiver DeSean Jackson unexpectedly a free agent, they may have gotten some.
That’s when the old fears really began percolating, the fears about Washington ponying up the millions Philadelphia wouldn’t spend on its own players because the Eagles didn’t think they were worth it anymore.
If there is any football logic gleaned from his 15-year experience as an NFL owner, Dan Snyder should at least know: Don’t take the Eagles leftovers.
DON’T — you can use caps.
Only Jackson and his agent knows what he's interested in.


I don't think anyone's speculation is any better than anyone else's Fear. You don't think Jackson would like to stick it to the Eagles twice a year? Sounds like a sure bet to me. But you may turn out to be 100% right. And Oakland would fit Jackson's, errr....'personality' like a glove.
If we sign Jackson, we can then focus our entire draft on safety, cbs and linemen.
It's mind-boggling, but possible that we at least hit on, and hopefully improved upon every single need we had before this FA started. That would be a success.
If we don't take Jackson, then we will likely use a higher pick on WR in the draft.......leaving a safety, CB or a lineman to be neglected.
They were right about Tara Reid's boob job - I can't imagine they aren't right on this too![]()
I keep hearing though that there are not a bevy of safeties in this draft as there are numbers at other positions.
My bet is we take a guy in Round 3 or 4 to play free safety down the road and use the #2 pick on a RT or top inside player for the OL that drops out of the first round.
Again, signing Jackson gives the Redskins a lot of flexibility with the draft picks come May.


[video]http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-free-agency/0ap2000000338536/Are-Redskins-front-runners-for-Jackson[/video]
[video]http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-free-agency/0ap2000000338536/Are-Redskins-front-runners-for-Jackson[/video]
Sounds like if we get him, we're going to pay through the nose for him...

Should we go in to the acceptance fetal position now?