- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 49,310
- Reaction score
- 7,207
- Points
- 2,244
- Location
- Greensboro, NC
- Military Branch
- Alma Mater
I
I don't get the 'he's not an athlete' comment. He's not Michael Vick. Neither are 2/3rds of the rest of the NFL's QBs. But the guy has some native ability and talent.
And by the way, if either guy isn't the long term answer, and the Shanahans suspect that, kudos To them for not jumping on a guy they weren't completely sold on. They had opportunities, but felt (apparently) either there was better value elsewhere or none of these guys were franchise guys. So good for them for not feeling compelled to do something.
I am looking for a link or something, but I have heard and read from. A couple of people that next years QB class has potential to be one for the ages. Much better than this year.
Posted via BGO Mobile Device
agree.
can't remember where....but I came across an article someplace that projected next year's QB as better than this years.
Just for ****s and giggles I scanned over Walterfootball's 2012 Mock Draft. There is now way any significant legitimacy can possibly be given since it is a year away and we have no idea what will happen in that time, I just wanted to see what kind of QB's will be there next year.
There are only 2 that are projected to go in the 1st round so far for next year. They projected 2 in the 1st round last year, which there were.
Where is this report that next year's class is going to be deeper in talent? Andrew Luck is projected to be the next must have QB, and the kid out of USC is projected high, but that's it for the first round. There were 4 QB's taken in the first 12 picks this year. I don't see that happening next year. The only thing I see is Andrew Luck is being projected as a sure thing.
You haven't joined any rooms.