SkinsLife
The UDFA
I highly doubt Kingsbury stays as an OC here next year. He should have a few HC options and i am sure he will take one of them. he cant afford another terrible year like this one.. as it will tank his value.
I don’t discount at all that there are systems in place to manage the NIL landscape, but at the end of the day valued transfers want to know that they will be the new coach’s ‘guy’ and to be romanced by him.
No player signed with Alabama (as an example) because of their FO-type organization, they signed because of Saban. I just personally doubt that Kingsbury has much of an appetite for playing the role of car salesman with young 20 year olds.
I highly doubt Kingsbury stays as an OC here next year. He should have a few HC options and i am sure he will take one of them. he cant afford another terrible year like this one.. as it will tank his value.
well... hot OCs are all the rage in the NFL as HC optionsYou think an NFL team will want to hire him as a HC? Why?
well... hot OCs are all the rage in the NFL as HC options
1. he has proven that he works well with Rookie QBs and can build an O for them for them to succeede
2. He has HC experience
I hope he does.. i am ready for a change in O
I am in the same boat, while i wouldn't hate it if he stayed.. i am ready for something different with more emphasis on getting the run game going. sure.. he failed with Murray.. but so did everyone else and its obvious the Murray is not a starting level QB. He was the only one that got one year of high level play from hiim.I’m with you, I hope someone hires him away for a few reasons although I don’t hate the guy.
I just don’t think he’s a very appealing HC candidate in the NFL, but you’re right that teams are usually thirsty for offensive minds. He failed pretty thoroughly with one 1st overall QB as a HC before though and didn’t really do anything impressive this year, and it’s a very “what have you done for me lately” league
He is #2 in the league in tackles
lots of a tackles is a terrible way to value linebacker play. all that means is that the rest of the D is so bad that he has to make all the tackles. Wagner is still smart and experienced.. he has that going for him. But.. he has zero lateral speed left. cant cover. He only gets tackles when a RB run right at him. Definitely a solid tackler... but we need so much more. You can do worse at MLB.. but you could also do a lot better. On this D, where they have a hard time getting much pressure on opposing QB... coverage LB is much more valuable.Yeah fans give him a hard time because he is clearly slowing down, but Wagner is still a tackling machine. I will add he was the key player in both successful goal line stands against Miami.
lots of a tackles is a terrible way to value linebacker play.
Where is Lavar and Chase? 🤣🤣🤣I don’t know, I still think football is about blocking and tackling, and here’s a list of the career tackling leaders:
![]()
NFL Tackles Career Leaders (since 1994) | Pro-Football-Reference.com
1. Ray Lewis (1,568), 2. London Fletcher (1,384), 3. Derrick Brooks (1,300), 4. Lavonte David (1,172), 5. Bobby Wagner (1,150),www.pro-football-reference.com
There are a lot of Hall of Fame players on there (and at least one who should be in London Fletcher and one who will be in Bobby Wagner).
I do agree Wagner is in the twilight of his career, and it shows in both his smart play and poor speed. He did have a good game against Miami though.
Anyway sorry to derail the all things offense thread, but I always liked guys like Fletcher and Wagner.
This is a great question. Like in any market, timing matters.So if KK leaves? Who do you want to replace him? Mike McDaniel (who will be available and has a Quinn connection), or other? Who would be best for a modern NFL offense and be able to leverage JD's skillset?
Speak up yee football maestros!
If Wagner gets his arms on a ball carrier, they aren't going anywhere.Yeah fans give him a hard time because he is clearly slowing down, but Wagner is still a tackling machine. I will add he was the key player in both successful goal line stands against Miami.
This is a great question. Like in any market, timing matters.
The draft -- sometimes pick #15 is amazing! Sometimes it is so disappointing, because all of the great guys are gone by 13, and now you are squarely in tier-2.
Ditto for your question; who will be available? The Patriots dropped everything (especially Mayo) when Vrabel became available. He is a proven winner with a philosophy they liked. It is a philosophy that works, and unfortunately it is working well in NEP. There's no magic, no big secret, to the biggest changes made there.
So, as for KK, I think many like the Shanahan tree and guys who may be offshoots of that. That tree has done pretty well offensively around the league. You could do worse, and I think there are some guys around who have experience due to all of the branching off and pilfering that has occurred. I'm not up on who may be available next year, but I imagine you could go for someone with that kind of pedigree and do OK - and who knows? Maybe Kyle gives you a pretty good assistant because he likes DQ and AP? I don't know who that could be, or how likely that is, but there are some connections there.

Ditto for your question; who will be available? The Patriots dropped everything (especially Mayo) when Vrabel became available. He is a proven winner with a philosophy they liked. It is a philosophy that works, and unfortunately it is working well in NEP. There's no magic, no big secret, to the biggest changes made there.
Vrabel was available last year and if we were going with a defensive HC is the one we should have hired. That isn't recency bias either. I live in Tennessee and saw what he did with a bad roster and a bottom 10 QB. And many many others said the same thing so it's not just us here locally.
Mc Daniel is going to be available as an OC more than likely and I'd drop Kingsberry in a second for him and probably somebody under McVay or Shanahan.
Why? Because in the NFL Kingsberry is pretty much a 1 of 1. His tree is a single chopstick.
I think McDaniel is gone at the end of the season. That is the vibe that I'm getting down here in Miami. IDKVrabel was available last year and if we were going with a defensive HC is the one we should have hired. That isn't recency bias either. I live in Tennessee and saw what he did with a bad roster and a bottom 10 QB. And many many others said the same thing so it's not just us here locally.
Mc Daniel is going to be available as an OC more than likely and I'd drop Kingsberry in a second for him and probably somebody under McVay or Shanahan.
Why? Because in the NFL Kingsberry is pretty much a 1 of 1. His tree is a single chopstick.
To be clear, McDaniel is considered a Shanahan tree person. I don't know either. I have some misgivings there, but I think as an OC it is definitely intriguing. I am just not always clear on his play design. It would never in a million years happen, but McDaniel as OC/playcaller with KK as the passing game coordinator (designing passing plays in particular), that would be interesting to me. Scott Turner, Kliff - they were both former QBs. That is a big reason their offenses feature the QB so much, and the QBs actually loved both systems (Alex Smith gushed over Turner's offense).I think McDaniel is gone at the enjd of the season. That is the vibe that I'm getting down here in Miami. IDK
The question is do we want him and can he help make this a prolific offense? Again, IDK