
RGIII is very exciting, but once again he didn't impress me much last night BB. I am not sure he is going to be able to play like that against NFL DE's and LB's who are much faster. He was solid and he is very exciting, but he is going to take a beating in the NFL playing like he did last night.
Keith Price looked far better last night playing in the pocket and running for the extra yardage after he went through his progressions. RGIII just seemed to eager to take off. And while I have only watched RGIII in about 3 or 4 games this year, this is what I continually see from him. People say he is a lot like Vick, well if that is the case I sure don't want him. Michael Vick is no Champion.

The football smarts was there last night. Early on, the Huskies used two spies on RG3 - both rotated and would cheat up to the line a bit. After a while, RG3 caught on to the fact that they were not going to alter that defense, so he called several audibles for Ganaway up the middle.
Watch a LB cheat forward on the left or right - it didn't matter after a while. A double team on the NT and spread the offense (three and four WR sets), then unleash Ganaway up the middle. Brilliant move by RG3 to rely on what was given to him by the UW defense and to diagnose it to perfection.
Did RG3 force anything last night? How many interceptions did he accumulate? The stats say "zero". 24-33 for 295 yds. I'll take that production with no interceptions every single time. I will gladly take the kind of leadership that shows poise, no panic, and take what the defense gives him. That's leadership. That's what the Redskins need.

El, you sort of answered my question but mostly you've caused me to rephrase the question in light of what you posted.
Would you classify Vick, Young, Tebow, and Newton as "flashy" as opposed to a traditional pocket passer-a la Peyton, Brady, or perhaps including more mobile QBs like Rodgers and Brees? I'm thinking you might and that is your problem with RG3, that is his style is more similar to the Vick, Young, Tebow, Newton style. Am I inferring your perspective correctly? If not let me know where I might have missed something.


El, I'm going to spell this out for you again.
UW decided to cheat two LBs (spies) on RG3. It's amazing that the Baylor QB had 295 passing yds while going 24-33 and zero INTs. You saw a QB who called an excellent game. He audibled the right plays that allowed three RBs to gain 101, 101, and 200 yds. That is leadership and poise.
But you are not convinced.
Let's take a look at how UW played Andrew Luck earlier in the season. They had two LBs assigned as spies. Luck ended up going 16-21 for 169 yds. Luck audibled running plays up the middle a number of times. Care to guess the stats? Stanford's RBs in that game had 138, 117, and 93 yds. rushing. Stanford scored 65 points. Sound familiar?
In both games, UW decided to shut down the star QBs and risked the running game going wild. Both QBs responded by calling stellar games and letting the RBs take center stage.

Flabbergasted by how unprepared and just plain FLAT the Tigers were for this game. Unbelievable!

The Tigers were certainly outcoached by a very large margin, but the players have some responsibility also. Its the National Championship! It shouldn't require the coaches to get you fired up.