- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 49,386
- Reaction score
- 7,271
- Points
- 2,244
- Location
- Greensboro, NC
- Military Branch
- Alma Mater
you heard it here: against teams with quick, fast defenses...RG will be a friggin disaster. He hasn't separated himself that much from Beck on the down or up side. if I'm an opposing d-coordinator...I'm bringing the farm after RG and just waiting for the turnovers. but if we have to endure him, so be it. after he totally tubes the Philly game making dumb-arse decisions under pressure we can get on with the business of finding an NFL caliber QB who has value against the best teams.
again: NOBODY....NOBODY...wanted RG when he was a FA. Why would that be? Having a system caretaker doesn't strike me as any kind of long-run plan for a team.
You're just a broken record on this. RG, against a tough Ravens defense, looked fine. As did Beck btw (although if RG had thrown the pick Beck threw up for grabs to a well-covered receiver, you'd be thrashing him for it). There's no basis for the turnover-machine claim you keep making - it's just what you want to believe. RG made some great passes last night, fitting the ball into tight places and hitting guys right in the numbers. Nobody wanted McNabb when we took him either - does that make him a scrub too? Sometimes it's about fit, style, and playing to a player's strengths. I think we can be reasonably successful with either guy, but I question whether you're even watching the games with some of the commentary.
Last edited: