The 2025 Free Agency Thread

mhd24 said:
I'd probably resign Bates as he's fine as a blocking TE who fills multiple roles. He won't be expensive either. If Ertz wants to come back and not retire, I'd absolutely love to have him. Was an absolute warrior today. Disagree big time on Wagner. I know he had an ankle injury, but he was slow even before it. Father Time catches everyone. It is obvious we need way more speed at LB next to Luvu.
Click to expand...

With Wagner, if the team feels he's out of gas, that's fine. But like, another 1 year deal wouldn't be horrible, I doubt given how much cap space we have that he'd push anyone out, and he's a tremendous positive from a culture perspective. I kind of want to keep some of these vet culture guys at least one more year until guys like Daniels/Sanristil can take over in the long term.

But yeah, he's mostly there for culture, not for play. We need a succession plan.
 
Wow, I just read that Ty Johnson is a free agent next year, he is better than any RB on our roster, he has 4.3 speed, the only reason he isn't starting for the Bill's is because they have Cook, we need a speedy RB who can also catch out of the backfield. We must sign this guy!
 
Possible eckler replacement. Need someone in that role, or did we sign him for 2 years?
 
Ekeler was 2 years, but his cap numbers aren't bad. If they want to move on, they can.
 
HOF28 said:
Possible eckler replacement. Need someone in that role, or did we sign him for 2 years?
Click to expand...
Yes, look around the league, Barkley, Gibbs, Pacheco, Cook, all speedy RB's that are difference makers. I admit they all have better offensive lines than we do however they also make plays just because of their speed. I am tired of having slow RB's with no vision.
 
Enforcer said:
Click to expand...


We really need to resign Ertz. He had 66 catches for 654 yards this year, but more than that, he was clutch. He showed up getting open in big moments and making huge catches and that was a huge part of allowing Jayden to be clutch. I'd love to see him back.

This FA class is not awe inspiring. There is very little at OT or on DL. There is some top end talent at WR and guard, and there are solid corners. I'd stock up there, as much as I can, and then focus in on the draft.

Higgins and Trey Smith would add two potential pro bowl level players, solidify our interior OL and give us another desperately needed playmaker across from Terry. I'd start there, grab Ward or Reed, and then fill out with depth.
 
Anselmheifer said:
We really need to resign Ertz. He had 66 catches for 654 yards this year, but more than that, he was clutch. He showed up getting open in big moments and making huge catches and that was a huge part of allowing Jayden to be clutch. I'd love to see him back.

This FA class is not awe inspiring. There is very little at OT or on DL. There is some top end talent at WR and guard, and there are solid corners. I'd stock up there, as much as I can, and then focus in on the draft.

Higgins and Trey Smith would add two potential pro bowl level players, solidify our interior OL and give us another desperately needed playmaker across from Terry. I'd start there, grab Ward or Reed, and then fill out with depth.
Click to expand...
He is old.

If he demands a longer contract?

There are always caveats. He was great for them, and if he is gone the team will absolutely need to fill his shoes or have a huge regression next year without a philosophical change. They relied heavily on him in so many key moments.
 
SkinsNumberOne said:
He is old.

If he demands a longer contract?

There are always caveats. He was great for them, and if he is gone the team will absolutely need to fill his shoes or have a huge regression next year without a philosophical change. They relied heavily on him in so many key moments.
Click to expand...

I agree. I think Zach probably only has a year left. And I'd love a TE that is more of a downfield threat. But I think he seems aware of where is is in his career. I think he's more likely to retire than to move on from Kingsbury and Jayden Daniels. I think this is where he finishes his career. Ideally, I would resign him and draft his replacement to groom behind him for a year. Play more two TE sets, where both TE's can be receiving threats.
 
Anselmheifer said:
I agree. I think Zach probably only has a year left. And I'd love a TE that is more of a downfield threat. But I think he seems aware of where is is in his career. I think he's more likely to retire than to move on from Kingsbury and Jayden Daniels. I think this is where he finishes his career. Ideally, I would resign him and draft his replacement to groom behind him for a year. Play more two TE sets, where both TE's can be receiving threats.
Click to expand...
They may be hoping that they did that with Sinnott, not sure. Yes, one more year - they may talk to him about exactly that. You are right too, he does sound very aware, not doing the whole "play until I'm 40" shtick. Honestly, I didn't know he had a year like THIS in him. He made me a believer, 100% and not just in him - helped by belief in the staff and FO too.
 
The problem at TE is Ertz’s supposed understudy Ben Sinnott looks like a potential bust.

So it’s not just as easy as saying bye to Ertz and figuring we can make do.

There are so many needs, to have to sign a veteran TE at this point seems like a nice to have rather than a must have.
 
Bulldog said:
The problem at TE is Ertz’s supposed understudy Ben Sinnott looks like a potential bust.

So it’s not just as easy as saying bye to Ertz and figuring we can make do.

There are so many needs, to have to sign a veteran TE at this point seems like a nice to have rather than a must have.
Click to expand...

I don't think Sinnott was drafted to be a Zach Ertz. He wasn't that in college. When Sinnott was drafted, a lot of people compared his potential role to that of a Kyle Juszczyk. A big, physical, utility player that helps make the offense more than the sum of its parts. If he is going to be in a more traditional role, maybe he becomes a rich man's John Bates. A John Bates that is a little bit more of a receiving option and has more positional versatility. We still need a guy with some twitch, hands, and route running chops to eventually replace Ertz. And Ertz's red zone and 3rd down production , especially in big moments, is just going to be extremely difficult to replace. I can see why Philly fans still love Ertz.
 
Anselmheifer said:
I don't think Sinnott was drafted to be a Zach Ertz. He wasn't that in college. When Sinnott was drafted, a lot of people compared his potential role to that of a Kyle Juszczyk. A big, physical, utility player that helps make the offense more than the sum of its parts. If he is going to be in a more traditional role, maybe he becomes a rich man's John Bates. A John Bates that is a little bit more of a receiving option and has more positional versatility. We still need a guy with some twitch, hands, and route running chops to eventually replace Ertz. And Ertz's red zone and 3rd down production , especially in big moments, is just going to be extremely difficult to replace. I can see why Philly fans still love Ertz.
Click to expand...

I didn’t watch Sinnott at KState but I want to think the reason he was drafted in the 2nd was because of his elite 9.72 RAS
 
Bulldog said:
The problem at TE is Ertz’s supposed understudy Ben Sinnott looks like a potential bust.

So it’s not just as easy as saying bye to Ertz and figuring we can make do.

There are so many needs, to have to sign a veteran TE at this point seems like a nice to have rather than a must have.
Click to expand...

I don’t think they did either. Based on his AZ tenure, my guess is they expected him to go down after a number of games and that would be Sinnott’s window to step in.

Based off what he did this year and his leadership, you do have to bring him back
 
Regardless of who is compared to and the role anticipated I do believe they had Sinott penciled in to take over the primary receiving tight end role. And I figured this was one of the safest picks they made. But I have been posting my concerns about his lack of playing time since the halfway point. Not calling him a bust but there is real concern for me.
 
My take about re-signing some of the players here:

Dyami Brown is a 3/4, at best. In no way is he a #2 WR. I wouldn't mind him back as the #4, which would probably require getting Higgins/Godwin in FA + a draft pick in the first 4 rounds. Having Dyami and Noah fight for the #3/4 spots would be ok if Higgins/Godwin were signed.

Chinn is being overrated by some in the fanbase. His regular season PFF grades were slightly above avg (run grade was clearly above avg) but his postseason grades were terrible.
1738008620331.png

1738008657995.png


They can't just change a couple of guys and expect the DEF to be a ton better. Just think about how much worse this defense would have looked if the offense didn't have so many (maybe the most in the NFL) drives of 10+ plays and such a time of possession advantage in so many games. They were 3-5 when they lost the TOP and 9-0 when they won TOP. And they weren't winning the TOP because of 3 and outs by the DEF. It needs a lot of improvement if they want to seriously contend in the playoffs.

I'd consider all of these guys at the right price but I'm not sure I wouldn't replace any of them except Way and Mariota.

Mariota
Ertz
Way
Bellore
Wagner
Fowler
Igbinoghene
Lucas
Dyami Brown
Noah Brown
John Bates
Trent Scott
Seibert
 
I'd expect Peters to go after some familiar names (to him) like Dre Greenlaw and Charvarius "Mooney" Ward from the Niners. Both would be upgrades.

The FA pool seems really deep with CBs this year. They have to pair Lattimore with someone capable and keep Sainritsil in the slot.
 
Do not resign Lattimore- see if he will resign for much less. Greenlaw and Ward would be great additions. Sign Reed, Ward, Douglas, or Davis at CB. Great Edge potential in the draft, pick one there. Offensive line has some very good 2nd and 3rd rounders in the draft. WR is weak in the draft. Sign one in FA, time to spend one there. DL is deep in the draft. Pick one there. Great start for year 2.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 4, Members: 0, Guests: 4)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top