I'm more concerned with the play calling with our running backs than if they can actually run. we are strongest to the right side so can we stop running draw plays up the gut? can we try some off tackle stuff? Maybe some more screen plays?
Jones has his issues but not even AP could succeed with the horrible play calling that was our coach/OC last year.
Can call the best running play in the world if your running back stuttersteps he is gonna get tacked for minimal gain
Ooh, I can play this game too!
If your coach calls three plays for one RB, then switches things around, it's hard for any RB to get into a rhythm, thus the stutter-stepping.
You're right, this IS fun!
Always like the highlight stuff, here's one on #52 Daniels put up by Tandler
If he makes the team and shows this stuff once in a while, guess we can..... call him 'Thumper'
Redskins? draft pick Daniels sure can create havoc | Rich Tandler's Real Redskins
But it's hard for you us to support this argument when Jones went out. Morris was given the bulk of the reps in the run game once Jones was on the bench and still never hit the hole like he used to. That is not "getting into a rhythm" that is a flaw in his vision and/or ability.
Problem is, "the bulk of" carries almost never equaled "enough" carries, for any back.But it's hard for you us to support this argument when Jones went out. Morris was given the bulk of the reps in the run game once Jones was on the bench and still never hit the hole like he used to. That is not "getting into a rhythm" that is a flaw in his vision and/or ability.
Problem is, "the bulk of" carries almost never equaled "enough" carries, for any back.
The last 4 games, (3 regular season, 1 playoff), with Jones out, Morris got the only stretch of consecutive, double digit carries per game, all season. They still weren't enough touches. But they seem to show that more touches did indeed help him get more rhythm going.
61 carries...283yds...4.6 YPC = Alfred ****ing Morris. When finally, and consistently called upon, Alfred delivered. There are obviously those among us that believe the biggest problem, is that Gruden didn't call on him enough, since he's been head coach.
Additionally, in the 4 games Alfred got more touches than Jones, he had a higher YPC average, every time.
In the 8 games Jones got more touches he had a higher YPC only 5 times. Morris 2 times. And one game (Panthers) they both were sub zero.
There were many problems with the run game last year. But Alfred was the least of them. The playcalling was. Blame whoever you want. But Gruden, as head coach, gets the lions share. The timing of calls, along with the willy-nilly approach to substitutions, made it look like a monkey trying to screw a basketball. I have said, and do indeed believe, that Gruden would struggle to properly use Jim Brown. Hyperbole? Sure. But his history, to date, does not inspire confidence. He'll have to earn it.
Alfred Morris has proven that under a different head coach he can run the ball effectively.
John Gruden has not proven, as a head coach or an OC, that with a different RB he can coach an effective running game.
Maybe Morris was just flat-out bad last year, but until Gruden actually puts together a decent running attack, I won't believe he can until I see it. The end.
The same things could also be said of Jay Gruden.
But it's hard for you us to support this argument when Jones went out. Morris was given the bulk of the reps in the run game once Jones was on the bench and still never hit the hole like he used to. That is not "getting into a rhythm" that is a flaw in his vision and/or ability.
If you don't think that causes a player to over-think things and causes them to become indecisive and stutter step, I don't know what to tell you.
Ax already told you this wasn't simply a Jones vs Morris argument. They just happened to be the participants last season. This is about a coach who appears to struggle, at the very least, incorporating an organized, effective running attack on gameday. Regardless of the backs involved.Again, this is not a Jones v. Morris argument so you and Ax can save that fight for someone else...this is about a RB that has demonstrably regressed in his last 2 season. You blame coaching, fine...I suggest it is a RB who has simply been battered in his 4 seasons in the NFL, and that has affected his ability on the field.
Now you're letting your inner liberal democrat loose. Nobody's trying to put Alfred in the HOF. We just haven't ordered a Fathead of Gruden's fat ass, yet.Edit: Let me break off another of my predictions that seem to go unnoticed because it goes against the grain and you guys are hell bent on giving a battered RB the benfit of the doubt, suggesting he could have been a Hall of Famer here if only he had a coach who lubbed him.
Alfred Morris will never gain more than 1000 yards in a season for another NFL team. Mark it...he's done, body too battered to take the pounding necessary to succeed. He cannot, will not, be able to carry the ball for 265-285 times again. But that's Jon Gruden's fault.
Sarcasm noted. But, for the record, Ax is on file supporting the continued employment of said, Gruden.Hopefully, Gruden will get fired soon, so we can have another coach to blame. ***sarcasm alert***
Well, you said you did "know" there had to be someone there worth taking. Clearly questioning whether Scot did. But, nice try.And Ax, I didn't say the GM was wrong, I simply suggested it was a head scratcher...and admitted, I do not know. Nice try though.
You haven't joined any rooms.