Voice_of_Reason
The Franchise Player
Staff member
BGO Ownership Group
Joe Gibbs Club Member
Top Monthly Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2014
- Messages
- 4,558
- Reaction score
- 5,379
- Points
- 543
Some people were making the comparison earlier. It’s not really apples to apples given opponents
(This rant isn't directed at you Conn ) I really hate the "4th place schedule" vs. the "second place schedule" thing. It's stupid and lazy reporting/analysis. This disappeared as a material thing in the 90's when the divisions started essentially the rotation they are on today, where you play your division teams twice, and then each team plays an NFC division and an AFC division, and then there are 3 games determined by record. And you can look up which division is playing which YEARS into the future. It's a rotation.
Here's our schedule:
Cowboys (2X)
Eagles (2X)
Giants (2X)
AFC West:
Chiefs
Chargers
Broncos
Raiders
NFC North
Bears
Lions
Packers
Vikings
3 other:
Falcons (2nd NFC South)
Seattle (2nd NFC West)
Miami (2nd AFC South)
So, as of this moment in time, we've played only ONE game that was determined by record, that's the Falcons. Which we lost. Also, Miami, which was a second place team last year, is 2-6 this year. The Falcons are all over the map, but 3-4 overall. And Seattle is good. So our 2nd placeness isn't exactly loaded with winning teams. Only one is definitively good.
Looking at New England:
Bills (2X)
Dolphins (2X)
Jets (2X)
AFC North:
Bengals
Browns
Ravens
Steelers
NFC
Bucs
Falcons
Panthers
Saints
3 other:
Titans (4th AFC South)
Giants (4th NFC East)
Raiders (4th AFC West)
Now, they have played 2 of their "other" teams, in the Titans and Raiders. HOWEVER, they LOST to the Raiders in week 1. They did crush the Titans. They haven't played the Giants yet.
The reason the Patriots season is easier is because the Dolphins and Jets are pathetic in their division, and they play them both twice, the AFC North has only one team with a winning record, the 4-3 Steelers, and the NFC South has only one team with a winning record, the Bucs at 6-2. Carolina is 4-4.
Our two divisions, the AFC West has 3 teams with winning records (only the Raiders don't have a winning record) and the NFC North has 3 teams with winning records, only the Vikings are below .500.
I take no issue with the Pats have played worse teams over the first 7 games, and maybe that's a factor for results, that's fine. But it's not because it's a 2nd vs. 4th place schedule. It's because their division stinks and the 2 divisions they are playing have a bunch of bad teams in them. And the divisions we drew don't. And they lost to one of the 4th place teams already, so the 4th placeness of that wasn't helpful to them.
I hate dumb analysis. . Hate it I tell you.

