I just rewatched Judkins. At this point I'ved watched him the most among these RBs. And rewatched Giddens.
Judkins -- good player, his build reminds me some of Clinton Portis, the Washington version of Portis. He was explosive as heck against inferior opponents -- Marshall. West Michigan. Otherwise, he was a solid singles hitter. His vision is inconsistent, he sometimes sees the crease and hits it fast. Other times he's Brian Robinson where he misses the crease and tries to run over guys and his success is hit and misson that front. Very solid. High floor. You can see at times his potential-athleticism. Unlike Robinson, when he turns the corner he can take it for a big run. But you don't see him do it a ton.
Giddens -- he was an early man crush for me, he's right back there with me now. I think he's right up there with Kaleb Johnson. Explosive and elusive in the open field. Sampson for example gets a lot of attention for being fast and seen by some as the poor man's Treveyon Henderson. But to me Sampson is more of a fast singles hitter with some occasional pop. This dude is just as fast as Sampson, is a better athlete and is much more explosive.
Sampson isn't the dude if you miss out on Henderson. And look I like Sampson. Feels like I beat him up some but that's pure as to context. There are some I like better than Sampson. And like I said about Sampson the other day -- he's better at getting tough yards than you'd think -- he's also worse at breaking long runs than you think. If what attracts us about Henderson is the explosive plays. Then the cousin to that is not Sampson. It is a dude like Giddens. i like him over Tuten on that front because he's more of a complete back. RJ Harvey just a little behind that albiet I think Harvey drops because of his age so Harvey might be the guy if we wait all the way to the late 4th. I'd be shocked if Giddens gets to the late 4th.