Based on how our FO does biz I would think they would have cut Wylie by now if that was something they wanted to do. If he's here he's not going to be on the bench at that cap hit. I wouldn't be surprised if Coleman becomes the swing tackle for next season.
He’s going to have a market I would think and will likely cost more than we will want to pay for a #3 when we have two WRs already getting big money.I wouldnt hate Kupp as our number 3. You can do far worse than that.

Left Guard I assume you mean for Coleman. I’d wait until after the draft to really start these projections.Wylie is a guy with real trade value given the tackle market has dried up sans Cam Robinson and his cap hit for next year is low. If we were to trade him, a team would only have to pay $8M for him, which is a steal for a starting RT.
Mark Bullock makes a strong case for putting Coleman at LT in pointing out that Tunsil and Biadasz are both high IQ players can help Coleman out a lot at LG by calling out protections and blitzes, giving him a higher chance to succeed than playing RT.
What I would do is let Wylie start at RT next year but draft a developmental tackle in the 3rd (if we land one) or the 4th and groom that guy to possibly take over in 2026
I bet Marriota follows Kingsbury when he leaves next year.
The RookI'm thinking if we traded down, picking up a tackle in the first or second. We would have a great o line set for years. Wylie, ironically enough, has become a good value now.Wylie is a guy with real trade value given the tackle market has dried up sans Cam Robinson and his cap hit for next year is low. If we were to trade him, a team would only have to pay $8M for him, which is a steal for a starting RT.
Mark Bullock makes a strong case for putting Coleman at LT in pointing out that Tunsil and Biadasz are both high IQ players can help Coleman out a lot at LG by calling out protections and blitzes, giving him a higher chance to succeed than playing RT.
What I would do is let Wylie start at RT next year but draft a developmental tackle in the 3rd (if we land one) or the 4th and groom that guy to possibly take over in 2026
The Myles Garrett deal also had a hand in it. That LTD got a lot more expensive.Pfffft. Puh-leeez. That’s way too much, I can see why he hasn’t been moved.
I hear they have Bruce Allen as an advisorThe Bengals always have had one of the worst FOs. They'll end up gettting nothing for him and he might even hold out.
Especially when you are dropping a 1st rounder on the deal as well. I might be willing to do our 2nd rounder. But then you are paying him 35 mill per year on top of it. That is rich.The Myles Garrett deal also had a hand in it. That LTD got a lot more expensive.
If I am the GM of a team I am not paying a 31 year old defensive lineman $35M and giving up #1 pick plus unless that player is truly generational - ie, Reggie White, Aaron Donald, or even Chris Jones.Especially when you are dropping a 1st rounder on the deal as well. I might be willing to do our 2nd rounder. But then you are paying him 35 mill per year on top of it. That is rich.
Yep, the Bengals lucked out when Washington beat Miami 17-16 in 2019 season so they could maintain the #1 pick and take Joe Burrow in the draft.
Our philosophy of attempting to win games at 1-9 or 1-10 was just assinine.
All respect to Doc Walker, but winning ONE football game in a losing and lost season doesn't mean much and can actually be costly long-term.