Kiem published an article in this morning's Washington Post where he railed against the idea of victory Monday. He had some okay points. Mainly that a winning streak and a playoff berth might keep the front office and coaching staff intact. But I did take umbrage in him bringing up Joe Gibbs. He brought Joe up twice. The first was fine. He talked about how long it had been since we were a contender. The second was dumb. In the second, he mentioned the Gibbs glory years and how you can't win without great players and then said the Commanders have to lose for better draft picks.
Joe Gibbs did not build great teams by getting high draft picks. Bobby Beathard never met a first rounder he didn't want to trade away. Charlie Casserly's first rounders were so so. Gibbs teams were great because Gibbs figured out what his players could do well and then designed a scheme around that and maximized each players potential. In fact, I remember Matt Millen coming to the '91 team and proclaiming that he'd never seen a team so full of B's (meaning there weren't a lot of great players, but everyone was good.)
So sure, we all want regime change. We all think we are never getting to the mountaintop with the team as Snyder built it, but losing for draft picks while a fashionable strategy was never remotely a legacy or even a thought during the Gibbs glory years.