- Joined
- Apr 11, 2009
- Messages
- 55,807
- Reaction score
- 17,399
- Points
- 2,743
- Location
- Greensboro, NC
- Military Branch

- Alma Mater

One comment about the 'group think' thing...
The fact that Adam Peters and his scouting and analytics experts landed on Jayden Daniels does not in any way indicate group think, or that they somehow acquiesced to it - does it?
I myself have doubts about all of the top QBs. It's the nature of the beast. Highly drafted QB prospects frequently fail. It's a fact. So no matter who you take, that is a risk. But Jayden Daniels has been listed almost universally as the 2nd best QB in this draft and I am going to suggest that it's because, he may well be the 2nd best QB in this draft.
If they'd gone with Drake Maye - it sounds like we'd feel better, because the Front Office went against conventional wisdom. But does that make any real sense - knowing that sometimes conventional wisdom is exactly correct.
I think you could argue that Drake Maye would've been a 'safer' pick since there seem to be fewer 'concerns' about him and his ceiling is perceived as so high. Peters and Company did not make the 'safe' pick. They picked the guy they think is going to be the best QB.
Anyway, my 2 cents on the topic.
The fact that Adam Peters and his scouting and analytics experts landed on Jayden Daniels does not in any way indicate group think, or that they somehow acquiesced to it - does it?
I myself have doubts about all of the top QBs. It's the nature of the beast. Highly drafted QB prospects frequently fail. It's a fact. So no matter who you take, that is a risk. But Jayden Daniels has been listed almost universally as the 2nd best QB in this draft and I am going to suggest that it's because, he may well be the 2nd best QB in this draft.
If they'd gone with Drake Maye - it sounds like we'd feel better, because the Front Office went against conventional wisdom. But does that make any real sense - knowing that sometimes conventional wisdom is exactly correct.
I think you could argue that Drake Maye would've been a 'safer' pick since there seem to be fewer 'concerns' about him and his ceiling is perceived as so high. Peters and Company did not make the 'safe' pick. They picked the guy they think is going to be the best QB.
Anyway, my 2 cents on the topic.
