Ax
Guest
So Snyder did good his first year?Uh, they went to the playoffs in 99 and had two picks the following year that allowed them to pick Samuals and Arrington
So Snyder did good his first year?Uh, they went to the playoffs in 99 and had two picks the following year that allowed them to pick Samuals and Arrington
Really? YOU need me to go through this again?
Ok, first thing I would have done is not traded away any more picks. If McNabb was merely a placeholder until we could get our future QB on the roster, well, he was a hell of an expensive one. He cost us picks, which could have been used to either pick more players or maneuver to get a QB, in the present or in the near future. Given that we were going to suck anyway I would have signed whoever was around and available to hand the ball off until I was able to draft someone. Rex Grossman immediately comes to mind. Then this year, with one of our five hundred picks grab a QB. Get 7th rounder if you want to wait until next year to get our real QB. I don't give a crap. Just get a young guy who you can send in there if Rex throws four interceptions, and then if he plays like utter crap you can at least chalk it up to the learning curve. Who knows? Maybe we'd actually get lucky for once.
But my thinking is, because we gave up picks for McNabb he wasn't a placeholder. We were actually going to build our team around him. In that case what I would have done differently is ... not do that. Given how insanely bare the cupboard was last year and how much we needed (and still need) to do to put together a decent team, starting with a 34 year old QB is about the last thing I'd have in mind.
Oh, yeah well the only thing I would have done differently was I would have kept at least one young guy on the roster who might actually have a chance of developing during the season. Keeping two middle-aged journeymen and nothing else ... I don't know. That just doesn't make a ton of sense to me.my bust. not what I was asking. My starting point: McNabb. done deal. player under the bridge. what do you do from that point forward? as I recall...you were opposed to drafting QB in the first round. correct me if I am wrong. given that we cornered a stellar player in kerrigan...a good preference in retrospect. that said....the trade down strategy sort of took us out of the QB derby. that's ok. but what should Shanallen have done after the draft? what were their options? guess I'm saying fol: once the draft strategy was settled...the QB dilemma was pretty much in the cards. no sense slamming Shanahan for that.....a higher priority was accorded to rebuilding the defense and RB corps. I, of course, am making a major assumption that bringing some vet was off the table as well (why repeat the same mistake?).
I guess a starting RG only counts as a ficticious signing... alrighty then.and who decided to go into this season with no real signings on oline? foerester is junk btw, Oline coaching is not easy especially a zbs, he is out of his depth.