Paul apparently did not solidify his role as the best LG.
He did because he took over from Coleman/Allegretti and held on to it. Of course that’s different than him being good or the team liking him as a longer term starter.
The team let him walk in free agency as soon as the season was over.
Yeah, but that’s how FA works. Either extensions are worked out before the season ends, guys are allowed to walk because they aren’t a fit or the team has other options, or the player wants to test the market.
They took him back after the entire league, including Washington, decided he wasn't worth enough to actively pursue.
Analysts thought he’d be due a pretty good contract, but they were wrong. Doesn’t mean no one pursued him though, including us. I mean, I wouldn’t say the entire league, including Washington, decided Diggs wasn’t worth enough to actively pursue…
You could be right though.
Coleman lost his LG job to Paul and failed to unseat him for the rest of the season. They decided Coleman still didn't progress enough as an LG to prevent shifting him back to OT when Tunsill went down.
The far more likely explanation is that Coleman was their best option at LT. With that said, your speculation could be correct (I’m presuming you meant this as speculation vs stating it as fact).
The team had 2 centers: One who started the entire season, and one who they believe can start. They cut their starting center, and the one they believe in sat out nearly all of training camp and all of the preseason. We have seen what a center like Nick Martin can do to an offense in 2022, and unfortunately Gulbin and Good-Jones have not looked any better. If Allegretti gets injured again, which looks likely considering how long he has been out so far this season, those backups are going to play, and it will be ugly without a massive step up by them.
Allegretti started the last 2 games actually. Obviously that’s too small a sample size (IMO) for them to assume he’d be a fine center for us, I’m just clarifying.
Tunsill getting injured is unfortunate but has been adequately dealt with. The backup LG who the team couldn't care less about struggling all through preseason was foreseeable considering they couldn't care less about whether another team took him in free agency. The extreme risk of center being a debilitating weakness was a foreseeable weakness that AP created by cutting his own starting center and not adequately replacing him.
“Couldn’t care less about” is an odd statement considering we re-signed him…
To be clear, I do agree with your overall perspective that circumstances strongly point to Paul not being a quality guard, and that rolling with Allegretti (along with Gulbin as the backup) is a risk at center. Certainly feels to me like the oline is likely to sink (or at least severely weaken) our season.
Personally, I’ve come around a bit on Biadasz getting cut (mainly due to scheme fit and the line call situation), but I totally agree that AP should have added a better player to compete with Allegretti. I’m not optimistic about Allegretti as our starter, but there are at least some things in his favor - he’s been very durable to this point in his career, he was apparently assisting Biadasz with line calls, he got a little trial run at the end of last year (and they got to see him practice earlier in the offseason), and while center is absolutely important, it’s the easiest of the oline positions to insulate.
Overall, I’m hopeful we sign (or trade for) a decent player or 2 to bolster the line - Decker, Glasgow, a camp cut, etc. If not, my next hope is that Allegretti is serviceable and Togiai winds up earning the LG spot ahead of Paul at some point. The latter is a
huge ask of an UDFA, but I do love his profile - strong, big, and highly athletic.