SkinsNumberOne
The Starter
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2013
- Messages
- 1,834
- Reaction score
- 1,183
- Points
- 263
This would be my theory (although maybe not specifically Linderbaum), but I think if they don't end up improving at C - and this was the plan - it was a net loss. I would think they also consider being able to reallocate that money elsewhere as having value.They’ve probably spoken to Linderbaum‘s agent and know they have a chance. But also realize they have Alligretti on hand as a reasonable fallback plan. So they were comfortable doing Biadasz a solid and letting him go early.
The question will be, did they get better? It's OK, they tried something, but we will easily be able to judge results here. It won't mean their idea was bad. But when you have bad results with "good" process many times over... eventually it does start some catastrophic pain.
This offseason is that offseason. They won't be able to easily rollback longer term contracts, which they signaled they would be putting out there.



