Just a quick point, and maybe it's irrelevant, but I listen to Keim also, because while I don't think he gets a lot of scoops, I do think he puts things together really well, and is well informed. Maybe it's a distinction without a difference. I like Keim.
I think the main point about Keim, in the debate you and I have had over the years, really comes down to this:
Keim is not trying to be Schefter. He is not focused on being first with every story. A good example was the Ben Johnson situation. When it started to look like those interviews were not going well, or that it probably was not going to happen, Keim began talking about that on his podcast. Then a couple of days later, Schefter reported it more directly.
That, to me, is Keim in a nutshell. Like I have mentioned before, I was on a Zoom with him years ago when he was doing one for Twitter followers, and he was asked about this exact subject. His explanation was that protecting sources matters more to him than being first. He said he cares more about being informed and not being wrong than about winning the race to break news.
He also said that when he mentions certain names in podcasts or articles, there is usually a reason for it, even if he is not stating it outright. He used Antonio Gibson as an example. His point was that he heard the team really liked him, he was not going to spell that out in a way that could expose sources or interfere with the team’s plans. Instead, he would mention the type of player they were looking at and reference names that fit and throw Gibson's name out in that context.
That is why I tend to take some of his name-drops seriously. For someone like me who follows free agency and the draft very closely, too many of those mentions have lined up with what later came out for me to view it as some sort of educated random guessing. Not every time, of course, but often enough that I think there is usually something behind it. And honestly, Sheehan has not been bad on that front either in the small rare doses he does it. For example, when both he and Keim mentioned interest in Fields before that draft, it later came out that there really was interest.
Another example was when they were looking for a quarterback in Ron’s third offseason. Wentz was not really being discussed, then Keim brought him up on a podcast, and shortly after, it happened. There have been a number of cases like that. Now, it is completely fair if you do not buy what Keim said in that Zoom and I gather that's the crux of our disagreement.
But I am going to keep throwing his stuff on here because while some might agree with you, I know there are plenty interested. So like anything people can take or leave it but I've been making posts like this long enough to know that at least some people are interested.