Always Commander Never Captain
The Free Agent Vet
Just watched Dillon Thieneman as there's been a lot of mentions of him lately. I like him, just not sure he's a real 1st rounder. He's in that same Mansoor Delane tier to me of 20's to 40's for pick range.
When Thieneman is shallow, he's got great awareness of routes crossing behind him and then follows them underneath (while keeping eyes on the QB) which takes it away. I've been impressed by that. He's versatile in alignments. They do 3 safety looks a few times where pre-snap it appears to almost be a Tampa 2-esque coverage where he's practically a deep Mike LB (Caleb Downs also does that on occasion). I wish I had All-22 film of both as safeties can quickly be cut off the screen. I've watched Mendoza throw against both and...I mean, what can I say. If Mendoza wants to throw a sideline back shoulder, there's nothing a safety can do to even be involved on that play.
I do not think he's as fluid as Downs when coming downhill, and I think Downs usually gets on the plus-leverage side of blockers better than Thieneman. Downs is mocked in the 1st for a reason, he may not have the juice of an elite athlete, but he is fluid. Thieneman also is noticeably different (in this case different is worse) than Downs at setting himself up to make a tackle on a ballcarrier. That's kind of like Downs best trait. But Thieneman is hustling and at times arriving to help on a tackle when you thought he wouldn't be able to get there. There are times Thieneman is the first guy to the ballcarrier, he can't finish the tackle, but he does hold up the ballcarrier for long enough that teammates can rally. I don't mind that much, as the yards gained after the Thieneman tackle attempt are often less than what the ballcarrier would have gotten if it wasn't someone like Thieneman being quick to the action.
I wish I had more film of both, some All-22. There's some give and take about who is better in what coverages between Downs and Thieneman. Areas where Downs is better isn't like Thieneman is bad, he's also good.
When Thieneman is shallow, he's got great awareness of routes crossing behind him and then follows them underneath (while keeping eyes on the QB) which takes it away. I've been impressed by that. He's versatile in alignments. They do 3 safety looks a few times where pre-snap it appears to almost be a Tampa 2-esque coverage where he's practically a deep Mike LB (Caleb Downs also does that on occasion). I wish I had All-22 film of both as safeties can quickly be cut off the screen. I've watched Mendoza throw against both and...I mean, what can I say. If Mendoza wants to throw a sideline back shoulder, there's nothing a safety can do to even be involved on that play.
I do not think he's as fluid as Downs when coming downhill, and I think Downs usually gets on the plus-leverage side of blockers better than Thieneman. Downs is mocked in the 1st for a reason, he may not have the juice of an elite athlete, but he is fluid. Thieneman also is noticeably different (in this case different is worse) than Downs at setting himself up to make a tackle on a ballcarrier. That's kind of like Downs best trait. But Thieneman is hustling and at times arriving to help on a tackle when you thought he wouldn't be able to get there. There are times Thieneman is the first guy to the ballcarrier, he can't finish the tackle, but he does hold up the ballcarrier for long enough that teammates can rally. I don't mind that much, as the yards gained after the Thieneman tackle attempt are often less than what the ballcarrier would have gotten if it wasn't someone like Thieneman being quick to the action.
I wish I had more film of both, some All-22. There's some give and take about who is better in what coverages between Downs and Thieneman. Areas where Downs is better isn't like Thieneman is bad, he's also good.
