clskinsfan
The Starter
My favortie trade down WR but I want to see him run first.
Rare I am with you....But I am here. Defense is done. A trade down for Lemon, Concepcion or Cooper would make a lot of sense.
My favortie trade down WR but I want to see him run first.
I think Tyson is by far the most dynamic WR in the class. He just cant stay healthy. Which means he is most likely off our board.I don’t think Tate is, but Tyson and Lemon have significant warts
I am not trading up for a running back ever.I’d honestly try to trade up to 3 for Love, as long as we fortify WR.

I would for the right RB in the right situation.I am not trading up for a running back ever.
I'd probably do it if we had more picks.Love is the guy I want. Above everyone else. I just can’t see giving up picks for him. As much as I’d like him.
If we were more well rounded as a team I’d feel better about it. But we still have so many holes to fill
Thing is you cant ever know if you are trading up for a RB like that. The positional value alone makes trading up for a RB not doable. You trade up for premium positions only.If you told me we could draft the 2026 equivalent of Edgerin James or Marshall Faulk but needed a modest trade up, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
I personally don't agree. I think there's too much stock put in what a premium position is. I get the reason why people say that, and there are analytics to back it up.Thing is you cant ever know if you are trading up for a RB like that. The positional value alone makes trading up for a RB not doable. You trade up for premium positions only.
Me too. I just don’t think he’s going to be there.Here is where I currently am if the team signs a Juwan Jennings or similar player (not named Aiyuk) in order, if available:
1. Love
2. Reese
3. Downs
4, Styles
5. Tate
And if they don’t sign a Jennings for comparable player (not named Aiyuk):
1. Love
2. Tate
3. Reese
4. Downs
5. Styles
I just can’t rely on Aiyuk in my calculus because there are so many open questions about him. Styles was and would be much higher on my lists had Chenal not been added.
Love fits my long-held desire of having an absolute weapon that could keep opposing DCs up at night and paired with Jayden…doubly so.
It is the cost of that position that matters. We just signed White for 2 million dollars. A really good RB. You are not signing a premium position player of White's history for less than 12 million. Not goona happen. That is my point. I would take any player at a premium position at 7 over Love. Because the draft is a crap shoot. And the economics of football say if you can lock down a premium position for 5 years you do it.I personally don't agree. I think there's too much stock put in what a premium position is.
Thats how to build a bad team. You take the best available talent in a draft. Every time.It is the cost of that position that matters. We just signed White for 2 million dollars. A really good RB. You are not signing a premium position player of White's history for less than 12 million. Not goona happen. That is my point. I would take any player at a premium position at 7 over Love. Because the draft is a crap shoot. And the economics of football say if you can lock down a premium position for 5 years you do it.
There is no way at all to know how a player longevity can or will be. There are players that you know are just special and most people think he is one of those special RBs that come once every 5-10 years.
I would for the right RB in the right situation.
However, we're not in the right situation because of lack of draft picks even if it was the right player. And maybe Love is the right player, maybe not. I would never do the Ricky Williams trade Ditka did, but a modest trade for a special player? Why not.
If you told me we could draft the 2026 equivalent of Edgerin James or Marshall Faulk but needed a modest trade up, I'd do it in a heartbeat.
To me, there are two levels of RB:
1) They change the game, future HOF level, worth it no matter what.
2) Everybody else.
If you can get #1, you should do it. It's a force multiplier for 5 years. And that's just fine.
So is Love more talented than Tate? Because I dont think he is. And take a look at the cotract difference between a RB and a WR....Thats how to build a bad team. You take the best available talent in a draft. Every time.
I still think it’s still early to pass final judgement.It’s not just the lack of picks, it is the ability to hit a high slugging percentage with the Day 2 and Day 3 picks, something the Lions and Rams have shown but AP has yet to show

I personally don't agree. I think there's too much stock put in what a premium position is. I get the reason why people say that, and there are analytics to back it up.
But if you think you're getting "that guy" go for it. If you're wrong, you're wrong. But if you have a chance to get a HOF level player and don't take it because they play safety or RB, then I think that's a mistake. Would I trade up for a center into the top 5? Probably not. Unless you were damn sure it was Jason Kelce. But you'd have to be really sure it was Jason Kelce. Kelce might have been as responsible for the Eagles SB wins as any player on the roster.
No. Usually RBs go 2nd or 3rd round. Then good years you can get a couple in the 1st. And not that often is a RB even considered the BEST player in the draft. Ill agree to disagree with that. We had so.many years of seeing good backs go in the 2nd or 3rd round. This year there is one stud back and a lot of people consider him the best player in the draft. Is he gonna be a Barkley, Bijan, Henry? IDK and im not saying that. But Im not hyping Love up. Everyone else is. But I do hope we draft him.Once every 5-10 years? Hyperbole if I’ve ever seen it. Feels like every year or every other year, there is a standout back who gets this type of treatment
Huh. You're right. I guess I just remember him celebrating a SB, maybe it was Travis' SB win.Kelce wasn't even on the team for the recent SB win.