Voice_of_Reason
The Franchise Player
Staff member
BGO Ownership Group
Joe Gibbs Club Member
Top Monthly Contributor
- Joined
- Sep 5, 2014
- Messages
- 4,558
- Reaction score
- 5,384
- Points
- 543
Yeah, but the flip side is you get what you pay for.Yes, but he doesn't cost us 35 million a year and draft picks, and is younger.
If you want one of the top 5 DE’s in the league, you pay for it. And this is exactly the type of thing I would pay for while Daniels is on his rookie deal and you can pay for it.
I wouldn’t be mad about Sweat, or a few others.
But if you can get a blue chip player, you should give it a shot.
In 2017, the Redskins had a chance to go sign Calais Campbell, but decided for the price of one, and at the time he was in his prime and a damn good player, they could get two, and they signed Stacey McGee and Terrell McClain.
It was idiotic Bruce Allen logic to spend less for lesser players and hope 2 average to below average players can make up for not signing one blue chip player.
Bruce was dead wrong. Jay tried to defend it and couldn’t even pronounce Calais’ name correctly (this was a drop on Galdi’s radio show for years).
I think the lesson: if you have a chance to get a blue chip player, do it, and pay for it. BUT make sure you’re paying top dollar ONLY for blue chip plagers
You get into trouble where you pay top dollar for average players because you overspend for need.