• Welcome to the New BGO! We know you will have questions as you become familiar with the new software. Please take a moment to read our New BGO User Guide which will give you a great start. If you find potential glitches, please report those in the Possible New Site Glitches and Issues thread. If you have questions, post them in the New Site Questions? thread.
  • The 2020 Season will be the last for our little community. Following the final WFT game of the 2020 season, the site will close it's doors. We wanted to give you a little advance notice so that you could retrieve any photos, content, or other material from the site before it became unavailable, so that you could exchange contact info with anyone you may desire, and ensure that folks would forgo any site donations going forward. We have had a blast being your favorite Redskins and WFT watering hole for the past decade. We had a great run and each of you were a part of it. Thanks to all of you for your amazing contributions and camaraderie. You made this a special place.

Redskins To Repeat 2008 Collapse?

One of many experimental iterations ...

Bulldog

The All-Time Great
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
15,488
Reaction score
384
Points
363
Location
Bethesda Md



The Redskins won 4 games with a tough first half schedule.

But when you go back and look at the team fundamentals, how well the team runs the ball, passes the ball, protects the quarterback, stops the run and limits the pass, Washington is near the bottom of the NFL statistics.

The one statistic in Washington's favor has been the turnover differential - 2nd best in the NFL.

That is what contributed the winning points in the opener against Dallas, against Green Bay and certainly against the Chicago Bears.

So, what happens when that fickle bounce of the ball goes the other way?

We saw a glimpse of that in the Detroit game. McNabb threw an ill-timed interception, and the game turned for good on the Grossman sack/fumble.

In the meantime, Detroit didn't throw the game to the Redskins. There was no pick six for Hall or sack/fumble for Orakpo to return for an easy 7.

The end result was a 12 point loss to a team that lost the next week to the 0-7 Bills 14-12.

The Redskins back end schedule is not easy. And there is no way the turnover differential is going to maintain itself in current balance.

One wonders whether the pass protection problems and failure to establish a ground game will ultimately catch up.
 

Jimbo

The Franchise Player
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
4,270
Reaction score
5
Points
68
Location
Columbia, SC


One wonders whether the pass protection problems and failure to establish a ground game will ultimately catch up.
This was a concern with many when Shanahan was hired. The ZBS is simply not made for the NFC East. The interior of our O-Line would probably not start for at least 2/3 of the teams in the NFL. Artis Hicks is playing like the career backup he is. Rabach is not even average at Center anymore and Lichtensteiger in place of Dockery has the majority of us thinking Shanahan or the O-Line coach is :insane:

Jamal Brown has been playing on one leg all year and, as a result, has done nothing. When he goes out and Heyer comes in, it becomes a nightmare.

I don't like admitting our wins have been fortuitous. Hall against Dallas, Vick getting knocked out in Philly, Clay Matthews getting hurt and Landry's pick against Green Bay and Jay Cutler being stupid enough to keep throwing at Hall. We won games but we really haven't BEAT anybody. In the games we lost, with the possible exception of the Rams, we rose to the occasion and were actually IN each game.......until now.

The soft underbelly has been exposed. No amount of creativity from Haslett can help this sorry excuse for a 3-4 Defense. If it's all about getting guys to learn it and buy in so they are better at it next year then they will continue to suffer the remainder of this year. OR.....you could adapt your Defense to the personnel, play a 4-3 the remainder of the year and actually challenge opposing Offenses. I'm pretty sure Haslett and Shanahan will stick with the former and that means we'll continue to suffer, defensively, against good teams.

I'll be watching the remainder of this horror movie with my hands covering my eyes, occasionally peeking through my fingers at the less-scary parts and praying the good guys don't get killed in the end.
 

Sarge

The Owner's Favorite
Joined
Jul 16, 2009
Messages
6,463
Reaction score
68
Points
128
Location
CTU

Air Force

Aside from the Houston game, our offense really hasn't done squat this year. Yeah, you look at scores and wins we've put up a few points and wona few games. But as Bulldog has pointed out, those wins were form things like the pick 6, not from having consistant drives for scores

I said 6-10 this year, but looking at the rest of the schedule, I'm not seeing it. Wonder what position 4-12 gets us in the draft?
 

Ax

The Ugly American
Joe Gibbs Club Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
15,001
Reaction score
260
Points
363

If we go 4-12, or 5-11, Shanahan should be fired.

Why? Because with all his experience, a better QB, and his so called better staff, he would have done no better than Zorn.

Unacceptable for someone of his tenure.

And no, I don't think that will happen
 

China

The Team Captain
Joe Gibbs Club Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
2,671
Reaction score
21
Points
68
Location
Falls Church, VA

Michigan State

The one statistic in Washington's favor has been the turnover differential - 2nd best in the NFL.

That is what contributed the winning points in the opener against Dallas, against Green Bay and certainly against the Chicago Bears.

So, what happens when that fickle bounce of the ball goes the other way?

We saw a glimpse of that in the Detroit game. McNabb threw an ill-timed interception, and the game turned for good on the Grossman sack/fumble.
We saw more than a glimpse against the Eagles. Three McNabb interceptions led directly to 21 Eagles points. The Redskins can barely score 21, they can't afford to spot another team that many points (or any points for that matter).
 

ntotoro

The Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
3,089
Reaction score
164
Points
93
Location
NoVa


We saw more than a glimpse against the Eagles. Three McNabb interceptions led directly to 21 Eagles points. The Redskins can barely score 21, they can't afford to spot another team that many points (or any points for that matter).
In all fairness, I can't pin the first one 100% on McNabb.
 

Henry

Coaching Staff
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
9,841
Reaction score
160
Points
219
Location
Fairfax, VA


I don't blame McNabb for the first one.

The second one was his fault, but ... Joey Galloway? Is he REALLY still on the team? I swear, our WRs are just awful. Yes that pick was McNabb's fault but I just have a sneaking suspicion that had we had a WR that wasn't a gabillion years old on the other end of that pass something positive (or at least non-negative) might have happened.

The third one I didn't see, but given that we were 478 points behind by then and everyone knew McNabb was going to be throwing it, picks are bound to happen.

I'm not trying to excuse McNabb really. But the way our defense was playing we could have been +3 in interceptions and still lost going away. Our turnovers added insult to injury, but they weren't the reason we lost.

Oh, and to answer BD's question: Yes. We could see another collapse. I knew that was a possibility all year, but I was enjoying the ride while it lasted. Given the fact that the Redskins haven't played a complete season in about 20 years, that's all you can do.
 

China

The Team Captain
Joe Gibbs Club Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
2,671
Reaction score
21
Points
68
Location
Falls Church, VA

Michigan State

I have no idea why Galloway is still on the team. Every time I see him he is dropping a ball or seemingly not giving effort. A waste of roster space.
 

Lanky Livingston

The Commissioner
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
27,017
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Houston, TX

Florida Atlantic

Can't pin first or second pick on McNabb IMO - 2nd was a terrible route from Galloway. 3rd pick was an ill-advised throw, but doesn't matter much as we were already down several zillion points. Plus, protection broke-down almost immediately on the play.
 

China

The Team Captain
Joe Gibbs Club Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2009
Messages
2,671
Reaction score
21
Points
68
Location
Falls Church, VA

Michigan State

I never said the picks were the sole reason we lost. But they definitely changed things. Without that early INT, they're only down 7 instead of 14. Would they have lost anyway? With the way the defense was playing, there is no question. But at least it might have been a more competitive game, and not a rout.
 

ntotoro

The Pro Bowler
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
3,089
Reaction score
164
Points
93
Location
NoVa


Can't pin first or second pick on McNabb IMO - 2nd was a terrible route from Galloway. 3rd pick was an ill-advised throw, but doesn't matter much as we were already down several zillion points. Plus, protection broke-down almost immediately on the play.
I didn't think about the second. I'm still not sure. Either McNabb or Galloway gave away that route. It's was plain to a blind man. I just don't know which of them it was.
 

Neophyte

GM
Staff member
Joined
Jun 30, 2009
Messages
8,531
Reaction score
168
Points
218
Location
Dallas


I guess I need to know what is meant by "collapse" in this context because right now I don't see a team in a position to collapse in the 2008 sense of the term.

Two years ago we were 6-3 after nine games and 2.5 games behind the NY Giants for the division lead. Right now we are 4-5 and 2 games behind NY and Philly for the division lead but I can tell you that this morning those 2 games feel more like 20 games.

Sure, we have won some games against decent teams, not great but decent. However, those wins didn't feel like wins most of the time. More like escapes.

As I have noted elsewhere, this is not a good team right now and it is not getting better as the season goes on. Guys are getting hurt, the QB seems to be regressing rather than progressing and the coaching staff seems to be expecting more than the current starting lineups can do. Add to that the fact that early on we snuck up on folks with an overhauled roster and new coaching staff where now teams have film to look at and figure out what we will do.

Looking at the rest of the schedule, I see 3 winnable games which would put this club at 7-9 and pretty much right around where most folks thought they would be . . . a .500 ball club, give or take a game.

I don't call that a collapse.
 

Henry

Coaching Staff
Staff member
Joined
Apr 12, 2009
Messages
9,841
Reaction score
160
Points
219
Location
Fairfax, VA


I wouldn't call 7-9 a collapse either. I don't think that's what BD is talking about.
 

Bulldog

The All-Time Great
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
15,488
Reaction score
384
Points
363
Location
Bethesda Md


Neophyte hit the nail on the head. This team is NOT getting better as the season progresses, we don't see younger players stepping up and becoming solid contributors.

Instead the ground game is gone. The passing game is now registering more interceptions than touchdowns. The third down offense is the worst in the NFL at 21%.

And we have the 34 year old McNabb throwing to the 39 year old Galloway.

How is that supposed to help the team get better?

How about ending the charade and bringing up Terrence Austin from the PS and giving him a chance in the second half?
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Private conversations
Help Users
    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Chat 0
    Top