You don't think a missed PI call in the end zone could not have changed landscape? Every fan of every team of every game ever played is convinced their team got the short end on calls. It's grown tiresome, especially when the team got beaten by 32 points.
To be clear, there were NUMEROUS penalties that were at semi-critical times.
Not all penalties and contexts are created equal.
Sainristil late hit on Barkley. Late? Yes. Egregious? No. Barkley hit hard? No. Do we see that play let go in many other circumstances? Yes. KEY TIME IN A CHAMPIONSHIP GAME? YES.
There is a lot of context. THIRD DOWN and LONG. The refs really took a big play in the game and made it their own there, and the circumstances demanded some real caution there. They exercised little.
Other plays:
- yes the PI. Again, similar problems, but in my mind that one is closer to yes, call it PI.
- the poking of the eye/grabbing of the facemask --> encroachment. By that logic, Jon Allen can eye gouge their center for a 5-yard penalty. Apparently, that's "Encroachment" right Hoaxuli?
No, there were too many. To just say it doesn't matter, isn't right - because when you don't call those penalties, there is more trash done by their team, and there is more demoralization (loss of confidence) on our guys. That psychological edge ABSOLUTELY MATTERS.
Yes, they got a few turnovers with good play. Guess what? The game was within 2-scores going into the fourth with all of that. The stupidity above just went on and on however.