burgold
Super Bowl MVP
Staff member
BGO Ownership Group
Joe Gibbs Club Member
2nd Monthly Contributor
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2011
- Messages
- 8,143
- Reaction score
- 6,785
- Points
- 643
Thinking about the rookies and free agent acquisitions this morning and circling back to concerns I had on draft day.
I think this team suffered from two philosophical problems. The first was their obsession with flex in team building. The old cliche "Jack of all trades and master of none" kind of fits with how we built the o line and how we drafted. We've acquired too many players who can play guard or center or guard and tackle over guys who are a great tackle, guard, or center. Likewise, the reason that Quan Martin excited the front office, Rivera, and JDR was that he could be a corner, a safety, and maybe even a big nickel hybrid player. Stromberg and Daniels too were apparently chosen for their ability to fit in at multiple positions. Someone once described our o line as four guards and a tackle. Wylie is a guard playing tackle. Cosmi is a tackle playing guard. Charles is a tackle playing guard. Gates is a guard playing center. In other words, pretty much our entire oline is playing out of position. Is there really any surprise it hasn't worked? We have too many tweeners and not enough prototypes.
The other thing I wonder about is the philosophy of flex while married to a needs-based draft. Looking at recent drafts, I can almost always guess what position they are going to take. This draft was no different. First round cornerback. Second round (okay, this surprised me) Third round oline, etc.
It seems to me the combination of not going for the best player because you desire positional flexibility combined with not going for the best player because you have a needs checklist and you are determined to draft a specific position each round has really hurt them this year. What it has led to was a draft where almost all of their players were considered reaches. What it has meant this year is that almost none of them have panned out or even seen the field... not even on special teams. Don't get me wrong, flex is great when you need to counter injuries and it helps in add confusion in certain schemes, but it's overvalued here.
So going forward, along with new coaches and a new front office... I really hope we develop a new philosophy.
I think this team suffered from two philosophical problems. The first was their obsession with flex in team building. The old cliche "Jack of all trades and master of none" kind of fits with how we built the o line and how we drafted. We've acquired too many players who can play guard or center or guard and tackle over guys who are a great tackle, guard, or center. Likewise, the reason that Quan Martin excited the front office, Rivera, and JDR was that he could be a corner, a safety, and maybe even a big nickel hybrid player. Stromberg and Daniels too were apparently chosen for their ability to fit in at multiple positions. Someone once described our o line as four guards and a tackle. Wylie is a guard playing tackle. Cosmi is a tackle playing guard. Charles is a tackle playing guard. Gates is a guard playing center. In other words, pretty much our entire oline is playing out of position. Is there really any surprise it hasn't worked? We have too many tweeners and not enough prototypes.
The other thing I wonder about is the philosophy of flex while married to a needs-based draft. Looking at recent drafts, I can almost always guess what position they are going to take. This draft was no different. First round cornerback. Second round (okay, this surprised me) Third round oline, etc.
It seems to me the combination of not going for the best player because you desire positional flexibility combined with not going for the best player because you have a needs checklist and you are determined to draft a specific position each round has really hurt them this year. What it has led to was a draft where almost all of their players were considered reaches. What it has meant this year is that almost none of them have panned out or even seen the field... not even on special teams. Don't get me wrong, flex is great when you need to counter injuries and it helps in add confusion in certain schemes, but it's overvalued here.
So going forward, along with new coaches and a new front office... I really hope we develop a new philosophy.


