Random Commanders Thoughts

Elephant said:
More of the same from an immature 24 year old who continues to suggest he's a leader on this team, stating as much in an interview just a couple weeks ago. I would say it does mean something...it means he has not matured enough to avoid controversy. And whether you want to believe it or not, Mike...it does convey to his performance on the field. Gotta agree with Goal, he has proven once again that he remains unteachable.
Click to expand...

This was semi-interesting the first 1,100 times it was posted. Now? Not so much.
 
"can't we all just get along?"

chuckle. chuckle.

let's press gents/ladies....this one will be resolved in training camp/preseason.

in a separate dept....or moving on to other not entirely on target subjects: I never get the feel that Gruden is an "all in Redskin". you never really hear him talking abt our history, brand, etc., with any sort of emotional conviction.....like it's what comes first and last for him. maybe he was just overwhelmed by his first season. but you don't hear that sort of leadership messaging from him.
 
fansince62 said:
"can't we all just get along?"

chuckle. chuckle.

let's press gents/ladies....this one will be resolved in training camp/preseason.

in a separate dept....or moving on to other not entirely on target subjects: I never get the feel that Gruden is an "all in Redskin". you never really hear him talking abt our history, brand, etc., with any sort of emotional conviction.....like it's what comes first and last for him. maybe he was just overwhelmed by his first season. but you don't hear that sort of leadership messaging from him.
Click to expand...

Our history? You mean twenty-something years ago?

Fan, you know the feeling you get when you see the Dan Marino jersey at the end of the bar on a Sunday afternoon? Do you actually want to talk football with that guy?

How about a Jim Plunkett jersey? Do you think they know football?

That's exactly the same way people feel when we walk in wearing an Art Monk jersey.
 
SNF said:
It really doesn't matter how many times you say the same thing or how strongly you believe it. I do appreciate your conviction. This crap is a grand total of nothing. Absolutely nothing.
Click to expand...

I and many others disagree with you...many others. Indicative of the whole. I always enjoy someone making the claim, "No matter how many times you say it". You keep saying the same thing too...doesn't make you anymore correct than I.
 
Winston appears to be going to the Yucs. So much for that pipe dream....
 
While I firmly believe rg3 has every right to social media, I sure wish he would see that he can't ever come out positive while engaging in it. Just leave the shit alone and enjoy all the perks that come with his career that most can't enjoy. Leave the regular mundane stuff to us hoi polloi
 
McD5 said:
"Our offensive line is the worst in the league and I said RG3 was a bust from day 1!"

Is there any new material, or have we reached the bottom of the well?
Click to expand...

Yeah but, how many times did you try to pass that bullshit about not needing a good offensive line? "...all we need is all-pro WR's and we can win!" Wanna give me the stats about how poor the New England Patriots offensive line is?

Ladell Betts! Ladell Betts!


Look, I found it amusing that you hit me with the "beat the dead horse" line...it was funny. But please don't act like you're exempt from the "bottom of the well" speak. You are the champion of

:deadhorse:
 
Last edited:
I truly feel sorry for the poor horse. It deserved to be turned to glue in a better fashion.
 
McD5 said:
Our history? You mean twenty-something years ago?

Fan, you know the feeling you get when you see the Dan Marino jersey at the end of the bar on a Sunday afternoon? Do you actually want to talk football with that guy?

How about a Jim Plunkett jersey? Do you think they know football?

That's exactly the same way people feel when we walk in wearing an Art Monk jersey.
Click to expand...

I get the mindset pov....on the part of the fans. you are right. I'm talking abt the coaches. win/lose or draw......among leaderships' missions is building the culture, instilling loyalty, submerging some individual instincts into the abstraction of the "corporate" personality. in this case, the "corporation".....is the team. I would argue that it is precisely in periods of uncertainty and under-performance that appeals to the past matter most. the Skins were emphatically a team of excellence and achievement in the past. these are not values that change with the prevailing winds. just saying that even absent references to better times.....I don't think Gruden is all that invested in the Skins as an enterprise with 70 years of history. I don't think...at least from a distance...that he himself has the mindset one would want the players to demonstrate. it's subtle. it's the difference between "let's win today" and "let's win to restore the tradition and pre-eminence of this Super Bowl winning franchise". Just reflecting that somehow....Gruden doesn't strike me as steeped in the Redskins as a team with traditions, a proud history, etc., etc. He wants to win....no doubt about that. where he wins....may not be all that important when he does his personal rank ordering.

simply put...and it's just my take: he doesn't strike me as passionate about our franchise. he's in it as a job. he's in it to win....as a marker of professional excellence and personal accomplishment. but the Redskins? they just happen to be the vehicle of the moment. is he a George Allen or Joe Bugel kinda Redskin? make up your own mind.

almost forgot: the players (or a lot of them) will follow the coaches' lead...even in this age of "me first" players.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elephant said:
I and many others disagree with you...many others. Indicative of the whole. I always enjoy someone making the claim, "No matter how many times you say it". You keep saying the same thing too...doesn't make you anymore correct than I.
Click to expand...

Again, I'm talking specifically about a twitter exchange here, so if you think I'm speaking to more than that, then I wasn't as clear as I should have been. I couldn't believe that people were using that as anything at all. You answered my question, and I should have left it there. I find it amazing the reaches that people make, especially when there's no reason to. Oh well. I'm looking forward to something real to talk about.
 
Gruden was considerably overmatched his first year. Nothing seemed to go right from the get go and confusion seemed to reign.

Part of this is the result of not having a GM to help provide structure and work on the roster.

Most GMs pick their coaches and have a vested interest in seeing them succeed.

I don't think McCloughan would have drafted Murphy or Long early on or sign Jason Hatcher to a free agent deal.

I also think he would have found a way to deal Orakpo's rights and recoup a second or third round pick for him and avoid tying up $11M in cap space on a frequently injured player.
 
random memory:

for the time that I could stomach dialing in Comcast: saw a clip of Pat Fischer....drum roll...tackling Riggins when he was with the Jets. pretty cool clip. typical Fischer...went in low/submarined...lifted the RBs legs and flipped him (more or less).
 
NFL Draft: First-round disappointment more likely than success | NFL | Sporting News

Here is a position-by-position look at the number of Pro Bowl players from the first round of the last 10 drafts.

Quarterbacks: 9 of 30 = 30.0 percent

Running Backs: 8 of 27 = 29.6 percent

Wide Receivers: 10 of 37 = 27.0 percent

Tight Ends: 7 of 13 = 53.8 percent

Offensive Tackles: 8 of 37 = 21.6 percent

Centers: 3 of 7 = 42.8 percent

Guards: 3 of 7 = 42.8 percent

Defensive Ends: 7 of 41 = 17.0 percent

Defensive Tackles: 8 of 33 = 24.2 percent

Linebackers: 13 of 32 = 40.6 percent

Cornerbacks: 13 of 39 = 33.3 percent

Safeties: 9 of 16 = 56.2 percent

Here are first-round picks from the last 10 years who made more than one Pro Bowl appearance:

Quarterbacks: 6 of 30 = 20 percent

Running Backs: 4 of 27 = 14.8 percent

Wide Receivers: 4 of 37 = 10.8 percent

Tight Ends: 1 of 13 = 7.6 percent

Offensive Tackles: 5 of 37 = 13.5 percent

Centers: 2 of 7 = 28.5 percent

Guards: 3 of 7 = 42.8 percent

Defensive Ends: 4 of 41 = 9.7 percent

Defensive Tackles: 6 of 33 = 18.1 percent

Linebackers: 8 of 32 = 25.0 percent

Cornerbacks: 6 of 39 = 15.3 percent

Safeties: 6 of 16 = 37.5 percent
....................................................................................................................................................


Somebody tell me again how 2nd & 3rd rounder's are expected to be 1st year starters.
 
2nd and 3rd rounders become starters in camp. They must beat out who we currently have, and from my perspective, they should. Oherwise you are drafting for backups, and failure. Ideally, you want a roster of "starters" who must backup and therefore provide you depth. "Next man up" doesn't mean plug and play. It means the backup must start and perform like a starter.

And I say draft a middle rounder for QB. As far as I'm concerned we are back to square one with looking for the franchise QB before this team can compete. But I don't want my next "franchise" guy to be drafted first or top ten, then is annointed the starter. I want my middle rounder to become the franchise guy through his performance and because he won't start right away, he can learn a little first without all the high expectations. Griffin was annointed the franchise guy without earning it. It had to happen that way, but I don't like it. Now we are where we are. Trying to find out what to do with him. By bringing in a middle rounder, then bring him along, and hopefully he will prove himself. When he makes the starting lineup, due to injury or performance, he won't be so raw. I want Mclovin to find the next Brady in a low round. Even Wilson was not the projected started out of the draft. He earned it in camp. Let's get a guy who earns it, then we'll see results.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 4, Members: 0, Guests: 4)

Who Read This Thread (Total Members: 117) Show all

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top