Pick your poison - what do you want the new name to be?

What do you want the new name to be?

  • Redwolves

    Votes: 10 47.6%
  • Wolves

    Votes: 6 28.6%
  • Commanders

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Sentinels

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Warthogs

    Votes: 8 38.1%
  • Hogs

    Votes: 2 9.5%
  • WFT

    Votes: 4 19.0%
  • Defenders

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Armada

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Presidents

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Brigade

    Votes: 1 4.8%
  • Something else (please comment)

    Votes: 6 28.6%

  • Total voters
    21
I think people are very frustrated with how today went and that's influencing that poll

After thinking about it all day, the way it all went down is definitely affecting my opinion. The whole thing is just a mess. The name itself, the uniforms, it’s all just kind of meh for me. It’s not the worst name and it’s not the best. The uniforms are what they are. I’m 44 and I’ve never been one to be in style and I understand the style of the younger generation is different than mine. Whatever they came up with in that front would probably not be my cup of tea, even if they will grow on me at some point. But 2 years of waiting and all the hype for this? Now I know what it’s like to be a cowboys fan and be sold hype for a long time only to be let down.

Clearly they aren’t trying to appeal to me. As others have mentioned, this whole thing was designed to appeal to new fans and people that aren’t fans. I get trying to grow the fan base, but you can’t keep pissing on the current fans and tell them it’s just a little rain. I kind of feel like they have a disdain for the fans who were Redskins fans and are fine if “those fans” don’t want to be part of the new name. This disconnect between the organization and the fans may have hit an all time high today.

And the icing on the cake is screwing up the Super Bowl dates on the crest. Has the team even addressed this? I’m guessing there will be some ridiculous spin about how only they understand the dates, but this really bugs me. This is so fundamental to the team history. Messing this up is inexcusable.

I know this will grow on me and eventually I’ll get over it, but today definitely is a kick in the nuts and the front office is just laughing and smiling about it.
 
I’m guessing there will be some ridiculous spin about how only they understand the dates

Ths would be some epic bullshit if they tried. I mean the date is even on the championship ring, for Gods sake!

1643883645547.png


Plain as Day! This just stinks of some marketing brand company who didn't know any better and just googled the Superbowl dates.

It's such a simple thing, but it just reeks of how big the disconnect is. ESPECIALLY after they've only just been pushing a whole crapton of videos and interviews and things CELEBRATING the anniversary of that Superbowl.
My mind boggles.
 
Hell, I grew to like Washington Football Team and wished it had remained over the new one. So I suppose over time the new one will be accepted.

I will remain a Redskins fan for the remainder of my days though.
[/QUOTE
MY thoughts exactly!!! I think its going to take a while tho
 
Ths would be some epic bullshit if they tried. I mean the date is even on the championship ring, for Gods sake!

View attachment 5599

Plain as Day! This just stinks of some marketing brand company who didn't know any better and just googled the Superbowl dates.

It's such a simple thing, but it just reeks of how big the disconnect is. ESPECIALLY after they've only just been pushing a whole crapton of videos and interviews and things CELEBRATING the anniversary of that Superbowl.
My mind boggles.
Do we know if anyone has asked them directly about these dates and challenged their thinking? All the other stuff, I'm pretty much whatever. Picking a new name was a no-win situation. But you have to get your basic facts right! Did anyone sit in the room and say these dates aren't a good idea?
 
If you haven't had a chance to read this, yet, fellow 'Mander fans, do so. Addresses a lot of the things we've been talking about, including why they were unable to go after Washington Football Club / DCFC. Which is something I had suggested on a pod months ago and was surprised to find was actually had broad support and was under serious consideration.

 
One thing it doesn't address is the ridiculous gaffe of using the wrong years to ID the Super Bowl wins.

The instrument capable of measuring the level of deaf dumb and blindness it took to run with that has not yet been invented.
 
That article makes me feel worse about the process not better :) Never underestimate the ability of executives in suits to overcomplicate things which at their core aren’t very complicated.
 
Reading that article, Keim sites the wrong dates too:

Because Washington wants to cling to its past -- it won three Super Bowls between 1982 and '92 and has played in five


He starts off right, then ends wrong. I feel like this is a marketing strategy from these dopes. Maybe it was just a typo on Keim’s part, but it seems like they are intentionally marketing the wrong years. If they can get their most popular beat reporter to repeat it (either by mistake or subconsciously), it’s going to take off.
 
Seems the team was so worried about offending a couple virtue signalers that they picked the most absolute ‘meh’ name possible. Theyre still not getting it when it comes to this franchises tradition, & appears never will.

Edit: If Wright & company don’t figure they’re shit out the only fan base that’ll be left are the pc wokes.
 
The late night types take their requisite swipes. We knew it was coming.


“The ‘W’ stands for ‘Why did it take you two years to come up with this?’” — JIMMY KIMMEL on the team’s new logo

“‘The Commanders’ kind of sounds like an action movie where Dolph Lungren and Sylvester Stallone join forces to defend their assisted living facility.” — JIMMY KIMMEL

“It’s the Washington Commanders. That really feels like a waste of a drumroll.” — STEPHEN COLBERT

“‘Commanders’ might be the only name more generic than ‘Football Team.’ I was hoping for something fun and new, like ‘The Washington Balloons’ or ‘The Fightin’ Dolly Partons.’” — STEPHEN COLBERT

“Interestingly, the franchise now shares a name with President Biden’s dog, who is also named Commander. Good thing they didn’t name it after Trump’s dog. ‘The Washington Pences’ — it doesn’t have the same ring to it.” — JIMMY KIMMEL

“The Washington Football Team announced today that it officially changed its name to the Washington Commanders, as in ‘Rams 37, Commanders 3.’” — SETH MEYERS

“I mean, call them whatever you want, they haven’t been able to command a winning season since Obama was in office.” — JAMES CORDEN

“To give you an idea of how fans reacted, shortly after the announcement, this is true, the word ‘terrible’ trended on Twitter, which is surprising, considering how Twitter is normally so welcoming and so positive.” — JAMES CORDEN



The ones I actually chuckled at were Kimmel's Pence reference, and Seth Myers'.
 
I like the last one by Cordon.

Kimmel might be funny…if he wrote his own jokes. I am waiting un-patiently for Whoopi’s take.
 
“‘Commanders’ might be the only name more generic than ‘Football Team.’ I was hoping for something fun and new, like ‘The Washington Balloons’ or ‘The Fightin’ Dolly Partons.’” — STEPHEN COLBERT

They should have gone with the fightin Dolly Partons. They already have the biggest bunch of boobs running the organization, you might as well have a mascot that is an accurate picture of the same thing.
 
Houston, we have a problem. (Unless he is referencing visiting fans.)

 
The haters up here in New York are calling us the Washington Commies!🤣
 
Actual pictures of the helmets





I really REALLY like the matte burgundy look. Now if we can get an actual logo that's representative of the name...
 
I'm with you on the burgundy. Since I don't take to change well ,for me ,the black one represents the move away from yesteryears so...:cautious:
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top