If this game is a launching pad for Luke, it can be way more meaningful.
I don’t dislike our WRs. I think our coaching positionally and OC has some question marks. A lot of times you have to judge your coaches on how they develop young dudes. Sainristil is a success so far. Elsewhere? Hm. Connerly. Coleman. They both showed basic issues to me. Technique issues. Prep issues.
Sinnott.
Lane. Mccaffrey.
Lane on PR looks great.
So I am not too high on positional coaching even going back to last year. When you get a lot of older vets it can hide issues in positional coaching. Ertz and Wags don’t need coaching. Luvu had a pretty bad game.
For me, the jury is still out on our OL coach. That was a great D line with great pressure but I want to see good technique and prep for our young guys. That would really sell me on our OL coach. I haven’t seen it but it’s hard to evaluate without more film and time. I remember last year, feeling Coleman late in the year had some serious technique issues which was disappointing.
Credit to the GB. Their gameplan was good. Have to fault our coaching for not adjusting. I called out our coaching in game 1. It was basically flawless. Not this week.^^^ Yeah if the OL can find themselves he Offense can right their ship. It is the key to being able to beat the Raiders and move on in the season
^^^ Yeah if the OL can find themselves he Offense can right their ship. It is the key to being able to beat the Raiders and move on in the season
Based on the Det. - Chi. Game, maybe Green Bay really is that good...
True. But it makes it harder to properly plan with only a few days not knowing exactly how good they areThey might be. But lol, that doesn't reassure me if the idea is to win a SB because good chance they need to get through them and or the Eagles to get to the big dance.
That GB Philly game is going to be a good watch.They might be. But that doesn't reassure me if the idea is to win a SB because good chance they need to get through them and or the Eagles to get to the big dance.
Hope not
