Ok, someone has to ask..."Are you now....or have you ever been......a member of the Cowboynist Party?
ESPN has poisoned your mind McD.
No poison from the media. On paper, it's pretty clear. Fortunately, games aren't played on paper though.
You take a team that came within an inch of the NFC Championship Game, add 3 first round players.....and you have a team that should at least make it to the NFC Championship Game this year. On paper, they've widened the gap in the division.
Barring a Romo injury or a meltdown, some combination of Dallas, Seattle and Green Bay has to the the odds-on favorite.
I love what we did in FA. Here's the Skins report card I'd give this offseason:
Free Agency--A+
Draft--Too early to know for sure, but I'll say B+. If BS turns into a tackle, then it moves to A-. If BS is only a guard, and Leonard Williams dominates, then it drops to a B.
Risk Management--D. I'd like to see some more consistency here, and some better decision making.
If McLovin is going to gamble, I want him to gamble where there is big upside. Instead, he chose the equivalent of risking $10,000 to win only $500 in the case of extending RG3. That was a big risk, with very limited gain (the dollars saved by not franchising him if he plays well). That was bad risk management.
On the other hand, McLovin had the chance to risk only $100 (a 7th round pick) with a chance to win $30,000 in the case of Collins. And he didn't take the shot. That too, was poor risk management.
I understand if he wants to be ultra-conservative and steer clear of Collins. Then don't make the RG3 gamble.
I also understand if he wants to take shots where warranted, with the possibility of huge upside and little downside. Then get Collins.
That's not what he did. That's my only complaint.