Del Rio says it's 'unrealistic' for Kerrigan to play 50 snaps

I’m fine with whatever they decide - as long as the end result isn’t him walking with us getting no compensation (even if it is just a 6th round pick).
 
No matter the coach or administration Washington has never been a team that stocked up on draft picks and dealt declining players whose deals were expiring or mid-career vets that wanted mega bucks. That's one reason we go into each draft with 7 or 8 picks instead of the 12 or 13 that Belichick often does.

We failed to trade Kirk Cousins or Trent Williams and recoup #1 picks for either when that was possible and ended up with a #3 comp pick and a #3/#5 from a team in SF picking late in the draft.

Other players like Kerrigan will leave and we will receive nothing back on them.
 
That is our track record. And it won’t surprise me if it happens again. Thing is, you can’t get value for a player if you wait until he has none, or if you actively undermine it by making it clear he’s not part of your future plans.

There are certainly guys who have been solid players, like Kerrigan who, if you keep them a few years past their prime, it’s not a franchise disaster. But what we don’t realize, because we never operate like a tough business where difficult decisions have to be made, is that doing so gives you limited draft picks. People will make sarcastic comments diminishing 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th round picks. But when you stockpile picks, that gives you the chance to find those hidden gemS. Even the Redskins have found them over the years once in awhile. When you chronically have minimum picks because you never move players while they still have value, Or give away late picks to sweeten the pot to get a mid-career FA, the chances of landing those hidden gems is greatly diminished.

When it comes to Kerrigan, he’s a good player. But he’s on the downside of his career, not part of the future, and it’s not like we’ve been to a bunch of playoff games or even had winning seasons because of him. I’d much prefer we have a fire sale for most anyone on the wrong side of 30 and load up for the future.
 
That is our track record. And it won’t surprise me if it happens again. Thing is, you can’t get value for a player if you wait until he has none, or if you actively undermine it by making it clear he’s not part of your future plans.

There are certainly guys who have been solid players, like Kerrigan who, if you keep them a few years past their prime, it’s not a franchise disaster. But what we don’t realize, because we never operate like a tough business where difficult decisions have to be made, is that doing so gives you limited draft picks. People will make sarcastic comments diminishing 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th round picks. But when you stockpile picks, that gives you the chance to find those hidden gemS. Even the Redskins have found them over the years once in awhile. When you chronically have minimum picks because you never move players while they still have value, Or give away late picks to sweeten the pot to get a mid-career FA, the chances of landing those hidden gems is greatly diminished.

When it comes to Kerrigan, he’s a good player. But he’s on the downside of his career, not part of the future, and it’s not like we’ve been to a bunch of playoff games or even had winning seasons because of him. I’d much prefer we have a fire sale for most anyone on the wrong side of 30 and load up for the future.


I agree for the most part, but I think the bigger disconnect here is that I think we're closer to contention than others do.... and not just that blip in the radar, get luck one year and fall off the next. I think we're still in a window of contention, that still overlaps Kerrigan's window of effective play.
 
Well I hope I’m wrong and you’re right :)
 
106.7 just reported that Rivera made it a point to tell JP Finlay (assuming it was on his weekly podcast) that Kerrigan WILL see more playing time going forward.
 
I mean, if he’s a starter start him. If he’s no longer better than the guys who are getting reps ahead of him, don’t.

I don’t get Rivera at times.
 
I mean, if he’s a starter start him. If he’s no longer better than the guys who are getting reps ahead of him, don’t.

I don’t get Rivera at times.


I imagine there will be more of a rotation going forward.
 
If we kept Kerrigan because Ron felt there would be a leadership void then I suppose guys like Jonathan Allen are not the leaders the press and fans have made them out to be.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Total: 1, Members: 0, Guests: 1)

Help Users

You haven't joined any rooms.

    You haven't joined any rooms.
    Top