Theismann To HOF
The UDFA
- Joined
- Aug 2, 2022
- Messages
- 250
- Reaction score
- 55
- Points
- 28
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- Military Branch
- Alma Mater
If Wentz was on fire would you piss on him to put him out?
Oh, I've been laughing at you for a while now. I'm just being vocal about it. Adults make their points, reinforce it once or twice, and then move along if people don't agree.Not sure why you laughed at my post. Washington averaged over 5 yards per carry against Dallas, which is supposed to have one of the best defenses in the league. I believe Washington had over 140 rushing yards total.
This offensive line is not that bad. We have a suck ass QB.
Oh, I've been laughing at you for a while now. I'm just being vocal about it. Adults make their points, reinforce it once or twice, and then move along if people don't agree.
But, please continue.
Not sure why you laughed at my post. Washington averaged over 5 yards per carry against Dallas, which is supposed to have one of the best defenses in the league. I believe Washington had over 140 rushing yards total.
This offensive line is not that bad. We have a suck ass QB.
We need to stop Henry. Point blank.Everyone has acknowledged we can run block and need to run more. They can’t pass protect if it was their Mom back there. It’s been terrible. It kind of matters.
Everyone has acknowledged we can run block and need to run more. They can’t pass protect if it was their Mom back there. It’s been terrible. It kind of matters.
I’d say games where we average 5 yds a carry and give up double-digit sacks probably suggest it - yeah If you read and/or listen you’ll find out Wentz is getting plenty of criticism from all of us.
WaPo is as legit in honesty as is Prisco
I'd suggest broadening your outlook if you want people to read your stats without bias.
I lied last night when I said I was done with you. Tonight I am.The Washington Post didn't create the stats, dude. They just posted them.
The stats have much more legitimacy than a bunch of people constantly whining about the offensive line and how they fail at protecting a clueless, washed-up QB.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - attributed to Benjamin DisraeliThe Washington Post didn't create the stats, dude. They just referenced them.
The stats have much more legitimacy than a bunch of people constantly whining about the offensive line and how they fail at protecting a clueless, washed-up QB.
I read plenty....look at the Washington Post articles that I posted today.
Which support my point of view, by the way.
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - attributed to Benjamin Disraeli
Not sure why you laughed at my post. Washington averaged over 5 yards per carry against Dallas, which is supposed to have one of the best defenses in the league. I believe Washington had over 140 rushing yards total.
This offensive line is not that bad. We have a suck ass QB.
I read plenty....look at the Washington Post articles that I posted today.
Which support my point of view, by the way.
Well, you're welcome to post some stats for everyone that shows that Wentz has played stellar football during the past 4 games.
Oh, that's right....you can't find those stats.
What's my problem, Mr. Wentz?
You eat shit, that's my problem. Go sit on the bench so that Heinicke can win 8 or 9 games for us.
As my stats show, Heinicke is more capable of doing that than any QB we've had over the past 20 years.
Look here Mr Irsay
Again youre tooting a horn based on opinion and not fact. Dallas does not have one of the best defenses in the league, they have one of the better PASS defenses in the league.. Their run defense is actually bottom 8 in regards to yards allowed. Yes we had 140 yards rushing... 101 of it in the first half... that translates to 41 yards rushing in the second half... against a statistically BAD rush defense...
View attachment 6225
He didn't say read articles, he said read posts here... nobody is saying Wentz is playing well... simply that it's not all him, and that your argument that Heinicke would be so successful is not as 'obvious' as you seem to think it is.
You've latched onto this article like it's some how gospel when it isnt. This is an advanced metric that takes the expected points on a drive and adjusts them based on the result of a play. What you're still sticking your fingers in your ears and screaming 'BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH' about is that it doesn't change our argument. The play call, protection, and ability for the WR to catch have an influence here. Wentz HAS missed wide open guys, he's thrown worm burners that we all agree are not acceptable at QB...
Go ahead and find a post on here to back up this assertion. Show me where ANYONE has said Wentz has played stellar football games? Where anyone has said he's done anything more than had a really good handful of quarters, but he hasn't been helped by multiple OTHER aspects of the team.
Your stats don't back you up, read the post. It's an analytic, not a stat. There is a huge difference. Statistics are data collected... Analytics are all about trying to anticipate.
This was the first 4 games last year vs the first 4 games last year... here's the first 4 games last year...
View attachment 6226
2-2 including, one of Heinickes best games last year against a TERRIBLE Atlanta team, as well as one of his absolute WORST games against Buffalo (which we all felt had shit playcalling int hat game also). Week 1 against the Chargers, the only reason he had that many yards passing was because of a 35 yard YOLO ball where McLaurin adjusted and made one of the catches of the year last year as it some how fell through the hands of a defender and Terry caught it as he was falling on his back. It was not a 'great' game by Heinicke, but he also didn't get the help he needed from his Defense as we had a failed drive in the 4th quarter and never got the ball back.
You haven't joined any rooms.