Lanky Livingston
Guest
Not hardly. They lead at the half, or in the 3rd or 4th quarters in a lot of the games they lost. He hadn't thrown 50 times at those points in the game, and they weren't playing from behind. What's your explanation for that? You're still acting like it was pass heavy for no reason other than they were playing catch up. Only they weren't, so your logic is still flawed.
The Packers were winners last season. And they did it with a garbage defense, no running game, and Rodgers throwing the ball 118 times fewer than Brees.
Look at the career numbers for Brees. With the exception of 2010 and 2011, the less Brees throws the ball, the more games his team wins. Generally when he throws it almost every down, he's ended up with a losing record. It isn't a coincidence.
Ex, they were playing from behind a lot. Their offense was good enough to keep pace so scores at the half or whatever might tell a different story, but they were often playing from behind.
Edit: that's how a potent, quick strike offense like the Saints does it.
And the Packers defense was bad, but not HISTORICALLY bad.



