Absolutely I respect the hell out of you and all you put into this vector of fandom. For years and years I’ve respected you and your positions. I want to make that abundantly clear.
No, none of us should ever completely trust any report/reporter. That would be a petulant self assembled echo...
Well SIP your argument is that Keim had direct access to the front facing executive of the franchise during the BA era. Most likely also during the RR era. I’m not entirely sure where his connection to access is coming from now beyond sheer seniority, but, he is frequently the first reporter...
Why bank on Commanders reporters risking their access vs outside reporter that doesn’t need the same level of access to justify his employment? How did that story help Schultz or Kliff? Again I ask, would Sheehan or Keim jeopardize their own access to out Peters? Highly unlikely. Would Schultz...
Firstly, I don’t believe Blough is Quinn’s choice at all. Who did we interview that had a realistic chance of getting this job? No one. Why would that be? Why would Quinn believe going from Kliff to Blough helps Quinn keep Quinn’s job? Who is less invested in Quinn’s job security? Adam Peters...
This is why Quinn should’ve been fired. This entire process is laughable and really makes Peters look even more in over his head. Heartbreaking tbh. Gambling like this with Jaydens career and what it means to this fanbase is organizational incompetence personified.
Well to be fair I did say “basically” no shot. Anything can happen. The point is when we wind up with one of these other 3 less inspiring coaches it will be time to ask some very difficult questions. Personally, I think it’s already time.
Would feel quite damning to have had Flores(we all agree basically no shot) and Gannon in here just to wind up with Morris, Graham, or Wilson.
Doesn’t feel like championship caliber hires are taking place at all to me. That’s on Peters.
The odds of Skattebo being the same player after that injury, for any length of meaningful time, are almost nil. Not to mention the threat he is to himself to hit the tent weekly.
From an ability standpoint I get the allure, from an availability perspective though, no thanks.
And it looks good on the prospective employee that it was all his previous employers fault because they were allegedly meddlesome without evidence to substantiate that position?
Seems like a very weak anchoring tactic within to me.
Then you must answer what the incentive is to smear Peters/FO? Peters and Kliff had a relationship I think years before working here. Why nuke the relationship?
Do you think Keim or Sheehan are going to report any of this if it’s true? I don’t. Schultz did though. Like it or not. We didn’t even interview anyone that could realistically be considered someone that would’ve or could’ve gotten the job over Blough.
Like I said earlier in the thread, Quinn...
I still think Blough has more to do with Newmark/Peters than it does Quinn. All this bending over backwards to avoid some pseudo hindsight mistake in Atlanta seems like retconned well wishing. That all seems like the pitch as to why this was the right way to go while simultaneously having...
Trust me I’m with you. I’d of much rather traded for and extended him than Samuel. I think his antics are a bit overblown by fans. Guys a savage and JD would feed that man’s family for generations IMO.