- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 1,647
- Reaction score
- 923
- Points
- 163
Dinner tonight. View attachment IMG_0184.jpeg


How did it turn out?Dinner tonight. View attachment 9008


You were correct. Not the optimum way to cook this cut. It was ok. Picanha is vastly superior as a roast. Strip needs to be steaks.How did it turn out?





You can smoke/grill a large cut of NY and then cut it into steaks at MR or Med. That's very good.You were correct. Not the optimum way to cook this cut. It was ok. Picanha is vastly superior as a roast. Strip needs to be steaks.











Gotta cook to temp!This was Sunday's cook before the game
Nicely marbled tri tip - trimmed and lightly dry brined a day beforehand
View attachment 9137
Stuck in freezer for an hour. Seasoned with a salt-free rub. Seared in cast iron skillet. Placed in oven at 180 F, then 220 F
View attachment 9138
Cooked to 128 F, then rested up to 133 F, then rested some more down to 130 F. This photo is for Skinsfan1311
View attachment 9139
First slice - note the lack of juice spillage
View attachment 9140
Sliced against the grain
View attachment 9141
How about some fresh chimichurri with that?
View attachment 9142
Supper time
View attachment 9144


Hmmmm.......think that would work on ribeye roasts too?You've got a keen eye. It's a trick I learned from the thermoworks site. The meat won't freeze, but it will get very cold. Get the meat at the surface and the meat just below the surface as cold as possible. Then sear it. Then cook it low and slow to temp. This will minimize the grey band that one often sees when slicing, and promote edge-to edge pink.


I'm old school and believe in resting large cuts, (I don't bother resting steaks, chops, chicken...they get enough rest as we slap the sides on our plares.Actually, the example in the thermoworks post WAS a ribeye roast! Haha .
Roast at 170! That is great. Seems I rarely have the time for such a long cook, but that is a great method at a super low temp. Yes, I like that. Considering your low cooker temp, pulled at 125, a 30 min rest would allow it to peak at roughly 130 I would think. And maybe just begin to come down? Then the oven sear would be awesome. I've done that before and it's worked very nicely - oven at like 500 F.
But there's something else going on that I'm trying to get to the bottom of. And that is the resting thing. There is a controversy re resting. Is resting good? Or is resting stupid? All the great chefs say resting is important. But the new age thinking is that resting is stupid, because the percentage of juice that might leak out is minimal relative to what would come out if you sliced right into it. There are a lot of videos discussing this. I'm not convinced.


Actually, the example in the thermoworks post WAS a ribeye roast! Haha .
Roast at 170! That is great. Seems I rarely have the time for such a long cook, but that is a great method at a super low temp. Yes, I like that. Considering your low cooker temp, pulled at 125, a 30 min rest would allow it to peak at roughly 130 I would think. And maybe just begin to come down? Then the oven sear would be awesome. I've done that before and it's worked very nicely - oven at like 500 F.
But there's something else going on that I'm trying to get to the bottom of. And that is the resting thing. There is a controversy re resting. Is resting good? Or is resting stupid? All the great chefs say resting is important. But the new age thinking is that resting is stupid, because the percentage of juice that might leak out is minimal relative to what would come out if you sliced right into it. There are a lot of videos discussing this. I'm not convinced.